Scott Stantis for August 07, 2022

  1. Triumph
    Daeder  almost 2 years ago

    The sword of Nucules.

     •  Reply
  2. Question 63916 960 720
    knutdl  almost 2 years ago

    “It’s just another day.” (Paul McCartney)

     •  Reply
  3. Yin yang
    Havel  almost 2 years ago

    Well, yesterday was. But, it is good to see some acknowledgement. Today, the potential for an accident or a rogue nuclear launch might be the biggest issue.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    winowino Premium Member almost 2 years ago

    Please, don’t forget Nagasaki – Aug. 9.

     •  Reply
  5. Lifi
    rossevrymn  almost 2 years ago

    Stanti’s strange mix of significance with asininity is his fail point.

     •  Reply
  6. Animals being weird
    wildthing  almost 2 years ago

    And all the radioactive waste is scattered across the planet……………..

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    davidcdaniels9  almost 2 years ago

    Never forget.

     •  Reply
  8. Dr coathanger abortions 150
    Teto85 Premium Member almost 2 years ago

    That was yesterday. I watched “Grave of the Fireflies” and “In This Corner of the World.” 200 survivors of the Hiroshima Bomb left the city and made their way to a city they thought would be safe, Nagasaki.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    sedrelwesley2 Premium Member almost 2 years ago

    Actually, ’twas yesterday, but point well taken.

     •  Reply
  10. Screenshot 20180802 120401 samsung internet
    Kurtass Premium Member almost 2 years ago

    The US, the only country that has used a nuclear bomb on another country. Yet they don’t want other countries to have nuclear bombs, for their own defense. Almost makes sense.

     •  Reply
  11. Ferrari 250 gt in rain
    ldmulvaney73  almost 2 years ago

    An interesting question – would you have let the Japanese government off the hook and let the Emperor and military leadership stay in control as if nothing had happened? That’s what they wanted, not an unconditional surrender as demanded by the US: “Japan might have to give up her overseas conquests and endure a period of disarmament. But there would be no occupation of Japanese soil, thus assuring continuance of the imperial system and Hirohito’s seat on the throne.”

     •  Reply
  12. Yin yang
    Havel  almost 2 years ago

    This topic is fascinating historically. Just to see the arguments stated with such certainty. You know what’s (mostly) missing in the above commentary? How the Japanese military reacted in real time to events as the war wound down. Take a look at “140 Days to Hiroshima” (Barrett) and the COMPLETE blame of the US might need a rethink.

    As “ldmulvaney73” pointed out those were the terms that Japan DEMANDED. Many in the military were prepared to sacrifice the nation in order that the Emperor not be “dishonored”. It’s right there in the historical record. Only the intervention of Hirohito quashed it (even then, military personnel tried to steal the recording of the emperor before it could be played.)What result would have satisfied millions of Asians occupied and suffering under Japan’s “Greater East Asian Co-prosperity Sphere”?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Scott Stantis