Donnie’s skin turning orange? Recall President Obama’s comment at one of his press conferences a few years ago, about John Boehner’s recent (at the time) “tan”, Barrack said, and I’m paraphrasing, “I guess that orange really is the new black!”.
James O’Keefe is a creep and IS UNRELIABLE. The man heavily edits his “reports” and has cost innocent people their careers just to further his falling off the cliff right wing agenda. The problem with you righties is that you fall for the O’Keefe and Bannon types because you so, so, so want to believe their nonsense.
“What [O’Keefe] does isn’t journalism. It’s agitpop [sic], politi-punking, entrapment-entertainment. There is no responsible definition of journalism that includes what he does or how he does it. His success at luring his prey into harming themselves is a measure of how fallible and foolish anyone, including good people, can sometimes be.”
And to show he is better than a bunch of stupid ropes, he’ll sink the Grand Old Ship in spite. He does not tell the truth. He is not presidential and he does not have the temperament to be our leader. His scandals should keep him buys enough once the Republican party’s tantrum is over on the 28th.
All I see is the usual distortions, misrepresentations & hoaxes.
.
The NYT did not hand editorial control over to Clinton. Most media outlets will give campaigns a chance to rebut or correct a story on the campaign before publication, especially if they are quoting someone from the campaign Trump’s campaign is afforded the same opportunity, but often ignores those requests.
.
The Ohio ballots in a storage locker story was a hoax
.
Polls run by all sorts of groups show Trump is behind. We heard the same idiotic claims of poll bias in 2012.
.
Scott Foval from the O’Keefe tape never worked for the Clinton campaign. O’Keefe is known to make unethical edits to make false claims. Foval may have been taken out of context. He may have been a blowhard idiot who was putting a joke on whoever was secretly taping. Only an idiot would equate protesting a Trump rally to rigging the ballot box.
.
Sorry, all you’ve done is prove once again that your posts can’t be taken seriously.
30 seconds into the video, it became obvious that the material was spliced together from multiple interviews. Scott Foval, who made the comments about disrupting Trump rallies, is a small potatoes local activist who contracts with various organizations. He was contracted with American’s United for Change, a progressive group that Bob Creamer was involved with.
.
You can splice together bits of video to give all sorts of narratives:
" And it’s just an opinion written by someone who doesn’t like James O’Keefe."
.
O’Keefe has repeatedly been caught editing videos to make it seem as if people said something completely opposite of what was happening. What he’s doing is propaganda, not journalism. It comes as no surprise that you’d think Project Veritas is a credible source.
The conspiracy theorists have an interesting dilemma, as you can’t prove a negative. True conspiracies are relatively rare. Their actual existence, however rare, is catnip to the theorists. They like to think that they and they alone have the discernment to identify conspiracies. It makes them feel like they have solved the riddle. They’re nobody’s fool. They often suffer from out-of-control confirmation bias. Occam’s Razor is the best antidote—but the theorists love the seductive special feeling they get knowing they are one of the only people clever enough not to be taken in.
You’re making the claims. You get to provide the sources otherwise, as Hitchens said (on antoher topic), “Assertions made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence”.
“Hillary kept going on about this “democracy”… which is essentially mob rule… the will of the majority. There is NO majority deciding this election or any in the future as long as the Electoral College crime racket exists.”
.
I think almost everyone here understands the reasons why we have a Constitutional Republic instead of a pure Democracy, except you & the huckster who’s site you linked. Our election process is very well monitored & very transparent compared to most. So called “Faithless Electors”, who vote for a candidate other than the one they were supposed to support, are exceedingly rare.
.
http://www.fairvote.org/faithless_electors
.
The only credible complaint you make is that the two parties have maintained a near monopoly on political offices from Dog Catcher to President. Trump may have partially solved that situation.
“You are typical of so many lazy slobs at gocomics. If you don’t like a link to a story you’ve been offered you reply the reporter is not credible or he’s not a journalist or that website is defective.”
.
Tom aside from your snide & insulting comments, you’ve made post after post that repeats things that I’ve shown to be blatantly false. It’s your own fault that hardly anyone finds you credible.
William Bednar Premium Member over 7 years ago
Donnie’s skin turning orange? Recall President Obama’s comment at one of his press conferences a few years ago, about John Boehner’s recent (at the time) “tan”, Barrack said, and I’m paraphrasing, “I guess that orange really is the new black!”.
kurt.zwicky over 7 years ago
Here we go again. Another conspiracy. How about a nice, credible source ??
Kip W over 7 years ago
Just like they let Russia edit and ‘sweeten’ those Wikileaks.
moderateisntleft over 7 years ago
James O’Keefe is a creep and IS UNRELIABLE. The man heavily edits his “reports” and has cost innocent people their careers just to further his falling off the cliff right wing agenda. The problem with you righties is that you fall for the O’Keefe and Bannon types because you so, so, so want to believe their nonsense.
Lyman Elliott Premium Member over 7 years ago
And once again the Rethuglicans cry WOLF! WOLF!
fregol over 7 years ago
Side-stepping the issue, huh? Maybe because you have no evidence? How very trumpian of you!
Frankfreak over 7 years ago
O’Keefe has been proven a film flam artist, not and investigative journalist.
youcantbeserious over 7 years ago
“Please… all deniers post your delusions directly below” ….. No one else needs to post delusions because you have already covered them very well.
kurt.zwicky over 7 years ago
Thank you for your polite and prompt response…
>
James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas Action
“What [O’Keefe] does isn’t journalism. It’s agitpop [sic], politi-punking, entrapment-entertainment. There is no responsible definition of journalism that includes what he does or how he does it. His success at luring his prey into harming themselves is a measure of how fallible and foolish anyone, including good people, can sometimes be.”
Dtroutma over 7 years ago
Well Donnie Dumpster’s in real trouble when his thin skin meets the barnacles on that keel hauling that’s coming!
Mr. Blawt over 7 years ago
And to show he is better than a bunch of stupid ropes, he’ll sink the Grand Old Ship in spite. He does not tell the truth. He is not presidential and he does not have the temperament to be our leader. His scandals should keep him buys enough once the Republican party’s tantrum is over on the 28th.
Uncle Joe Premium Member over 7 years ago
All I see is the usual distortions, misrepresentations & hoaxes.
.
The NYT did not hand editorial control over to Clinton. Most media outlets will give campaigns a chance to rebut or correct a story on the campaign before publication, especially if they are quoting someone from the campaign Trump’s campaign is afforded the same opportunity, but often ignores those requests.
.
The Ohio ballots in a storage locker story was a hoax
.
Polls run by all sorts of groups show Trump is behind. We heard the same idiotic claims of poll bias in 2012.
.
Scott Foval from the O’Keefe tape never worked for the Clinton campaign. O’Keefe is known to make unethical edits to make false claims. Foval may have been taken out of context. He may have been a blowhard idiot who was putting a joke on whoever was secretly taping. Only an idiot would equate protesting a Trump rally to rigging the ballot box.
.
Sorry, all you’ve done is prove once again that your posts can’t be taken seriously.
Uncle Joe Premium Member over 7 years ago
Clickbait junky
Uncle Joe Premium Member over 7 years ago
30 seconds into the video, it became obvious that the material was spliced together from multiple interviews. Scott Foval, who made the comments about disrupting Trump rallies, is a small potatoes local activist who contracts with various organizations. He was contracted with American’s United for Change, a progressive group that Bob Creamer was involved with.
.
You can splice together bits of video to give all sorts of narratives:
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8AK6FOz99E
Uncle Joe Premium Member over 7 years ago
" And it’s just an opinion written by someone who doesn’t like James O’Keefe."
.
O’Keefe has repeatedly been caught editing videos to make it seem as if people said something completely opposite of what was happening. What he’s doing is propaganda, not journalism. It comes as no surprise that you’d think Project Veritas is a credible source.
Kip W over 7 years ago
And how does Trump react? With jokes about the violence, and offers to pay bail for those committing it. That says something about him.
bobviously over 7 years ago
Good luck fighting the good fight, Tom. They’re hopelessly lost. I just read the posts once in a while to see how much so.
twclix over 7 years ago
The conspiracy theorists have an interesting dilemma, as you can’t prove a negative. True conspiracies are relatively rare. Their actual existence, however rare, is catnip to the theorists. They like to think that they and they alone have the discernment to identify conspiracies. It makes them feel like they have solved the riddle. They’re nobody’s fool. They often suffer from out-of-control confirmation bias. Occam’s Razor is the best antidote—but the theorists love the seductive special feeling they get knowing they are one of the only people clever enough not to be taken in.
Kip W over 7 years ago
I can tell you’ve seen the Copy and Paste buttons.
mdhutton1949 over 7 years ago
You’re making the claims. You get to provide the sources otherwise, as Hitchens said (on antoher topic), “Assertions made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence”.
Uncle Joe Premium Member over 7 years ago
“Hillary kept going on about this “democracy”… which is essentially mob rule… the will of the majority. There is NO majority deciding this election or any in the future as long as the Electoral College crime racket exists.”
.
I think almost everyone here understands the reasons why we have a Constitutional Republic instead of a pure Democracy, except you & the huckster who’s site you linked. Our election process is very well monitored & very transparent compared to most. So called “Faithless Electors”, who vote for a candidate other than the one they were supposed to support, are exceedingly rare.
.
http://www.fairvote.org/faithless_electors
.
The only credible complaint you make is that the two parties have maintained a near monopoly on political offices from Dog Catcher to President. Trump may have partially solved that situation.
Uncle Joe Premium Member over 7 years ago
“You are typical of so many lazy slobs at gocomics. If you don’t like a link to a story you’ve been offered you reply the reporter is not credible or he’s not a journalist or that website is defective.”
.
Tom aside from your snide & insulting comments, you’ve made post after post that repeats things that I’ve shown to be blatantly false. It’s your own fault that hardly anyone finds you credible.
.
Uncle Joe Premium Member over 7 years ago
There’s a sucker born every minute.