DONALD TRUMP PROMISES TO REOPEN 9/11 INVESTIGATION IF ELECTED
“First of all, the original 9/11 investigation is a total mess and has to be reopened” he told the crowd of supporters. “How do two planes take out three buildings in the same day? I never got my head around the fact that nothing is mentioned about the destruction of Building 7 in the 585 page document” he explained, talking about World Trade Center 7 which also collapsed during the September 11 attacks.
“Why did the administration at the time not take legal means against Saudi Arabia? Weren’t 19 of the high-jackers from Saudi Arabia?” he asked aloud. “Americans deserve answers and I would definitely request a new investigation so that this horrible tragedy never happens again” he told the crowd under a thunder of applause.
It was a sad day, and a big screwup by the administration. But a lesson can be had from Crow Nobo’s post in that Trump can’t keep anything straight, or correct, so he makes up more to be outraged about.
This is a Facebook comment to a story on this at Foreign Policy Journal:“The journal discussing the 9/11 building collapses is not called Europhysics, it is called EurophysicsNews. It is a news magazine, not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. It is not THE journal of the European physics community: I belong to that community and I have never heard of it. The Magazine’s editors have a note at the head of the article saying that some of it is speculation, and that the editors accept no responsibility for its content. The authors are not European, they are north Americans. Three are scientists or engineers, one is a non-technical director of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The article does not have the scientific authority that Paul Craig Roberts attributes to it.”
For all you conspiracy theorists out there, please note that the official US government explanation for what happened on 9/11 is indeed already a conspiracy theory.
Can anyone show me a video (besides in Manhattan) where a burning high-rise building collapses into itself? especially one that did NOT get hit by a plane like Building 7?
Happy Two Shoes over 7 years ago
DONALD TRUMP PROMISES TO REOPEN 9/11 INVESTIGATION IF ELECTED
“First of all, the original 9/11 investigation is a total mess and has to be reopened” he told the crowd of supporters. “How do two planes take out three buildings in the same day? I never got my head around the fact that nothing is mentioned about the destruction of Building 7 in the 585 page document” he explained, talking about World Trade Center 7 which also collapsed during the September 11 attacks.
“Why did the administration at the time not take legal means against Saudi Arabia? Weren’t 19 of the high-jackers from Saudi Arabia?” he asked aloud. “Americans deserve answers and I would definitely request a new investigation so that this horrible tragedy never happens again” he told the crowd under a thunder of applause.
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/donald-trump-promises-to-reopen-911-investigation-if-elected/
Dtroutma over 7 years ago
It was a sad day, and a big screwup by the administration. But a lesson can be had from Crow Nobo’s post in that Trump can’t keep anything straight, or correct, so he makes up more to be outraged about.
stevebenson over 7 years ago
I have bigger fish to fry on 9/11 than you.
ny27lars over 7 years ago
This is a Facebook comment to a story on this at Foreign Policy Journal:“The journal discussing the 9/11 building collapses is not called Europhysics, it is called EurophysicsNews. It is a news magazine, not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. It is not THE journal of the European physics community: I belong to that community and I have never heard of it. The Magazine’s editors have a note at the head of the article saying that some of it is speculation, and that the editors accept no responsibility for its content. The authors are not European, they are north Americans. Three are scientists or engineers, one is a non-technical director of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The article does not have the scientific authority that Paul Craig Roberts attributes to it.”
Richard S Russell Premium Member over 7 years ago
For all you conspiracy theorists out there, please note that the official US government explanation for what happened on 9/11 is indeed already a conspiracy theory.
Richard S Russell Premium Member over 7 years ago
PS: The clearest evidence that George W. Bush wasn’t behind the 9/11 attacks was that they actually worked.
alexzabala over 7 years ago
Can anyone show me a video (besides in Manhattan) where a burning high-rise building collapses into itself? especially one that did NOT get hit by a plane like Building 7?