Mike Luckovich for August 05, 2010

Correctamundo! Who cares!

SuperGriz, thanks for the link - I am tripling my donations to Republicans that will execute the plan..

tell it like it is…..!

ANandy, you are so funny in your stupidity you should be on ‘America’s Got Talent’ or some other FOX idiocy.

E Pluribus Unum translates to “Out of many, one”.

The 16th Street Baptist Church bombing on September 21, 1963 was carried out by members of a white radical group with Christian links. Should all Christian churches be banned?

ANandy, it is Islamic, not “mohammedan.” If you are going to so incoherently illustrate your ignorance of our world, the least you could do is get your terminology down.

Out of many,one, by the way, dolt.

New York, New York: My kind of town!

Ah, the moral equivalence … .

Of the 17+ armed conflicts around the globe, how many are being perpetrated by a religion other then the cult of Islam?

All of them- it’s the religion of profit behind all of them.

Welcome to New York.

Petergrt ignorantly posts: “Of the 17+ armed conflicts around the globe, how many are being perpetrated by a religion other then the cult of Islam?”

Tell us, Peter, how does that trump our Constitution?

ANandy, your ignorance has already been revealed.

if you are a racist/moron New York city is hell. There are kids in the school system that speak 200 languages. I speak 3 languages (and I am a US citizen but was ILLEGAL for 14 years– got legal in a way that is not possible anymore) . There are Masjids, Christian churches of about every denomination I can think of. 2 Wats -one Thai, 3 Mandirs, 1 Chinese Buddhist temple, 2 synagogues (one that some of the congregation is of Latinoamerican origin) in a 15 minute walk from my house (and I am an atheist) I attend something like 4 new year celebrations in a year in different months. I have Buddhist, Muslim, Christian, Jewish and atheist friends and acquaintances. I make mostly vegan food at parties and keep any meat dishes very separate to accommodate everyone.

Long live the constitution!!

fear NY, we are the future. hide in your caves.

Pete; the oppression of tibethan buddhists by communist China, Northern Ireland…just the ones I’m thinking about right now. And in many places (unless you think those people must always be wrong BECAUSE they are muslims) they are not the aggressor; Xinyang for example.

There are so many immigrants in NYC (along with their worship places), a mosque was bound to be around there.

Anandy; “muhammadan” is to “muslim” what “papist” is to “catholic”.

Bruce,

Stop being cute.

Of course, I read my own “posts” (links, actually).

“petergrt said, about 23 hours ago

SuperGriz, thanks for the link - I am tripling my donations to Republicans that will execute the plan..”

Proof positive. http://tinyurl.com/337rwq8

ANandy responds: Catholic (lower case c): “adj. 1. Broadminded, as in belief, tastes, or views; liberal; comprehensive. 2. Universal in reach; general.” Webster Contemporary Dictionary, pg 112.

Only ANandy would claim that the word “catholic”, as used here, doesn’t have anything to do with the Pope.

ANandy replies: “Again involving yourself in other’s posts”

And again you’re amazed that when you post in a public forum, the public replies.

“I referred to Frog’s spelling.”

Right, yet you ignored all the other instances of non-capitalization.

And also ignored C. Frog’s point.

“I do admit I was baiting someone like you.”

Contradicting your first sentence. Nice job.

ANandy replies: “Thanks. Are you taking up for Frog, poor little man? Incidentally, where did you find my amazement?”

Not sure what “taking up for” means…but I would rather have seen you respond to Frog’s post rather than duck it.

Amazement, in that you again took the time to remark on the fact that people responded to your posting on a public forum.

ANandy replies: “Remind me again of your standing in Frog’s and my discussion. Oh, that’s right. You have none.”

I thought we’d been over this, yet again you can’t grasp the concept of public response to a public posting.

“You took the bait”

Again, you contradict yourself. On one hand you it was a response only to Frog; in the next breath you claim it was “bait”. (I don’t believe the latter for a second, but it’s still a contradiction.)

“If Frog cares to weigh in I’d be happy to explain where she errs.”

Really? Then why didn’t you do so in the first place, instead of dodging the issue and instead unnecessarily pointing out an error in capitalization?

Oh, yeah, you abandoned the issue so you could instead “bait” people like me, trying to elicit a response from people you don’t think should be responding. Right.

ANandy replies: “You are so easy it’s hard to resist. Sometimes it’s fun to throw something out to see what comes along. ”

So you were lying when you said you meant it to be between you and Frog. Noted.

ANandy replies: “This was never your issue”

So you were lying when you said you posted it as “bait” and that “Sometimes it’s fun to throw something out to see what comes along.”

Liars need a better memory than you seem to have, ANandy.

You know, ANandy, perhaps if stopped with the lies and contradictions, and posted more substance, you:

Wouldn’t feel the need for the constant lame attempts to buttress your posts with ad hominem attacks.

Wouldn’t feel the need to keep telling others how superior you are.

Wouldn’t feel the need to keep deleting all your posts out of embarrassment.

Just a suggestion.

ANandy says: “Anthony, when one finds oneself in a hole, stop digging.”

Does that mean you’re going to stop lying and contradicting yourself?

Or just keep digging…

Yup, just as predicted, you chose to keep digging yourself in deeper.

It’s tough when you get caught in your lies, and don’t have the integrity to admit it, isn’t it, ANandy?

Here you go again:

ANandy: “Again involving yourself in other’s posts…I referred to Frog’s spelling.”

ANandy: “Remind me again of your standing in Frog’s and my discussion. Oh, that’s right. You have none.”

And now, lying yet again in a fruitless attempt to cover past lies:

ANandy: “Your statement claiming I meant it to be between me and Frog is a lie.”

How can you possibly think you can lie like this, when the proof of your lying is right on this thread? Even when you predictably delete all your posts, you can’t delete my copy-and-pastes of them.

Lying in a way that you must know means you’ll get caught moves you from “liar” to “pathological liar”. You even call it “fun”.

ANandy: “Now accept the consequences of your action.”

I demonstrated that you’re a pathological liar. I can accept that.

That’s progress, ANandy…this time you didn’t lie, nor deny you lied. Good for you!

Regarding your little “pathological elitist” dig…I don’t think I’ve ever questioned your intelligence. I admire the fact that you’re in the top percentiles for spelling, grammar, vocabulary, and I tend to equate those qualities with a good education (or at least being well-read).

Which makes it all the more a shame that such qualities get hidden behind your near-constant ad hominem attacks and, well, lies. You don’t seem to be the type who needs those.

HA! Once again, you sobered up, and deleted all your posts.

http://www.gocomics.com/mikeluckovich/2010/08/05/

Lucky that I had the foresight to record them out of your reach. Why do you even bother?

What more could you do to admit that you’re nothing more than a little narrow-minded bigot who posts only when you’re inebriated, than to delete your posts when you sober up?

Pathetic doesn’t even come close to describing you. You do realize that there are treatments for addicts like you?

Run away, ANandy, just like you always do. Is there any way you could be more pathetic???