The “top secret” emails were classified only recently and then they said they were so secret that they can’t show them to anybody and then they implied Hillary was retroactively guilty of mishandling classified material. Is that the conservative government everybody wants? And of course, innocent until proven guilty doesn’t apply and the speedy trial is after the election is over but then they will probably forget the whole thing.Of course, they will continue to dribble out accusations for the rest of the campaign. The irony is they accuse Hillary of being dishonest.
Yes now we are ready to hear about her emails. Sanders is the only politician that is anywhere near truthful.She is full of dirty tricks and it may be pre-determined that she should win, but she can’t beat the republicans but Sanders can.
Northern Redman said, 1 day ago@Frankfreak“I’ll give you a hint. Executive Order 13526 Sec. 4.1(d). The rest you can find for yourself.”
4.1 (d) Classified information may not be removed from official premises without proper authorization._______________________________O.K. how does this relate to the emails?
I’m not a Hillary supporter but I am a truth supporter and you are wrong about the facts, ChevJames. You need to look into the actual charges and the actual evidence, not the BenghaziBenghaziBullghazi that the GOP (and not Bernie) is throwing at her. Look it up and don’t let the talk show fascisti lead you around by the nose.
Theodore E. Lind Premium Member about 8 years ago
The “top secret” emails were classified only recently and then they said they were so secret that they can’t show them to anybody and then they implied Hillary was retroactively guilty of mishandling classified material. Is that the conservative government everybody wants? And of course, innocent until proven guilty doesn’t apply and the speedy trial is after the election is over but then they will probably forget the whole thing.Of course, they will continue to dribble out accusations for the rest of the campaign. The irony is they accuse Hillary of being dishonest.
Odon Premium Member about 8 years ago
lib – you assume to know far more than your writing has demonstrated over the past many months.
Odon Premium Member about 8 years ago
And thank you for cementing my point.
kaffekup about 8 years ago
lib – I can’t believe you stuck around today! Usually you drop your nonsense and cut and run.
Frankfreak about 8 years ago
Please provide where in these acts and orders, In context, Mrs. Clinton violated them.
Ryan Plut about 8 years ago
THIS IS A COMICS PAGE, PEOPLE! IF YOU WANT ANYBODY TO READ YOUR POLITICAL CR*P — POST TO ANOTHER SITE. WE COME HERE TO GET AWAY FROM POLITICS.
Frankfreak about 8 years ago
As I cannot find where they support your accusation, please tell us what sections you are referencing.
pam Miner about 8 years ago
Yes now we are ready to hear about her emails. Sanders is the only politician that is anywhere near truthful.She is full of dirty tricks and it may be pre-determined that she should win, but she can’t beat the republicans but Sanders can.
Frankfreak about 8 years ago
Northern Redman said, 1 day ago@Frankfreak“I’ll give you a hint. Executive Order 13526 Sec. 4.1(d). The rest you can find for yourself.”
4.1 (d) Classified information may not be removed from official premises without proper authorization._______________________________O.K. how does this relate to the emails?
Frankfreak about 8 years ago
Why would Jesus read a newspaper?What does an immortal being who was not immortal (he was killed, correct) have to do with the discussion?
Michael Peterson Premium Member about 8 years ago
I’m not a Hillary supporter but I am a truth supporter and you are wrong about the facts, ChevJames. You need to look into the actual charges and the actual evidence, not the BenghaziBenghaziBullghazi that the GOP (and not Bernie) is throwing at her. Look it up and don’t let the talk show fascisti lead you around by the nose.