Baslim elsewhere pointed out to another ignorant poster that it was the police that shot and killed the attackers. The injured security guard was unarmed.
“According to city authorities an unarmed guard at the event was shot at before the men were engaged and killed by police.”
The basic point is that we should not be required to give up our free speech rights because of a new group of people who want to move here to get away from Despotism and create that same despotism here. Unfortunately, all of you on the left and those who are afraid of the Islamic extremist nuts are simply making their job easier.
I have no interest in living in any of these extremist worlds.How is it that these guys were able to buy guns? One was on the FBI radar as a terrorist. He also was no stranger to federal investigators." In 2011, he was convicted of making a false statement involving international and domestic terrorism."http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/04/us/garland-mohammed-drawing-contest-shooting/index.html
Simpson and Soofi: Americans. So, the Second Admendment applies to them, as it applies to every American. (?)At least, this is what the NRA (and all it’s members, every one) would appear to maintain. No restrictions!Looks to me that this case would illustrate that there is a large disconnect between the NRA and many of it’s members. And, American society in general.
A reminder: first definition of “infidel” in the Oxford English Dictionary: “anyone a non-Christian”. It then goes on to describe that ALL relgions consider “outsiders” as the infidels. Clans of crazies aren’t rare, or exclusive to any one “faith”.(like the over 30,000 Christian sects around the world who all get along with each other??)
Three most dangerous books ever printed bible, koran, torah all 3advocate killing unbelivers especially if they don’t follow your brand of the same religion. Islam is just doing what Christians in 30 years war . My bible,koran, torah, interpretation is diffrent than your so you must convert or die
Illegal is obvious. Thanks for explaining me the simple concept.Not hinting at more rules or laws. The question is how would you stop criminals and terrorist from getting guns?Or would you just accept things as they are now?These terrorist got guns and injured one innocent person. The next time we maybe not so lucky.People die every year by guns and many guns are stolen.you are going the wrong way. So tell us the right way.
Dtroutma about 9 years ago
And they were just at the NRA range yesterday letting the kid play.
OmqR-IV.0 about 9 years ago
Baslim elsewhere pointed out to another ignorant poster that it was the police that shot and killed the attackers. The injured security guard was unarmed.
“According to city authorities an unarmed guard at the event was shot at before the men were engaged and killed by police.”
Mneedle about 9 years ago
The basic point is that we should not be required to give up our free speech rights because of a new group of people who want to move here to get away from Despotism and create that same despotism here. Unfortunately, all of you on the left and those who are afraid of the Islamic extremist nuts are simply making their job easier.
PainterArt Premium Member about 9 years ago
I have no interest in living in any of these extremist worlds.How is it that these guys were able to buy guns? One was on the FBI radar as a terrorist. He also was no stranger to federal investigators." In 2011, he was convicted of making a false statement involving international and domestic terrorism."http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/04/us/garland-mohammed-drawing-contest-shooting/index.html
6.6TA about 9 years ago
Simpson and Soofi: Americans. So, the Second Admendment applies to them, as it applies to every American. (?)At least, this is what the NRA (and all it’s members, every one) would appear to maintain. No restrictions!Looks to me that this case would illustrate that there is a large disconnect between the NRA and many of it’s members. And, American society in general.
Dtroutma about 9 years ago
A reminder: first definition of “infidel” in the Oxford English Dictionary: “anyone a non-Christian”. It then goes on to describe that ALL relgions consider “outsiders” as the infidels. Clans of crazies aren’t rare, or exclusive to any one “faith”.(like the over 30,000 Christian sects around the world who all get along with each other??)
PainterArt Premium Member about 9 years ago
The DOJ has a history of not doing anything to straw buyers for the cartels.and sellers that sell to anyone.
genemascho about 9 years ago
Three most dangerous books ever printed bible, koran, torah all 3advocate killing unbelivers especially if they don’t follow your brand of the same religion. Islam is just doing what Christians in 30 years war . My bible,koran, torah, interpretation is diffrent than your so you must convert or die
ratflinger Premium Member about 9 years ago
The terrorist lost. Christians aren’t going around killing people just for the hell of it. You both need to move on to modern times
PainterArt Premium Member about 9 years ago
Illegal is obvious. Thanks for explaining me the simple concept.Not hinting at more rules or laws. The question is how would you stop criminals and terrorist from getting guns?Or would you just accept things as they are now?These terrorist got guns and injured one innocent person. The next time we maybe not so lucky.People die every year by guns and many guns are stolen.you are going the wrong way. So tell us the right way.
andrew5 about 9 years ago
Based on a false premise. It’s not ‘free speech’ that offends them – it’s invading their countries. Or should America be allowed to do that?