I started to try and explain the issues here, but clearly there was no point. They didn’t want to hear it.But for those who are interested in knowing the FACTS here:http://www.salon.com/2014/10/21/12_reasons_texas_new_voter_id_law_is_racist_partner/
I am sorry to see you disregard a sourced article, even given your factually incorrect opinion of the site’s founder. If you felt that any of the facts stated in the article were incorrect the best means of refuting it would be with accurate facts.-As it is, the article is accurate, which is consistent with my experience with breitbart.com. Here is a second article addressing the matter:-http://triblive.com/opinion/editorials/5831290-74/richardson-voting-fraud
Actually researching a candidates record or the many proposals on a ballot requires time and money. Maybe this is why so many don’t do it? Does this also constitute a poll tax? Too bad that so many government offices require one to produce a picture id. They must all be racist as well.
Way back when, my brother came home and said the Brown folks were paying folks to go in and vote for Brown instead of Nixon for Governor. I went down to check it out, and yes, they were paying people to vote, but it was the NIXON folks paying for the votes… at last you don’t see that rampant a “fraud” out there today.
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
Guy in the back is chasing down a Coke.
jackhs over 9 years ago
I still do not know what is so hard to get registered and have ID to vote. You have how many months and years between votes?
Motivemagus over 9 years ago
I started to try and explain the issues here, but clearly there was no point. They didn’t want to hear it.But for those who are interested in knowing the FACTS here:http://www.salon.com/2014/10/21/12_reasons_texas_new_voter_id_law_is_racist_partner/
griffthegreat over 9 years ago
The new Taney Supreme Court.
BaltoBill over 9 years ago
That’s Uncle Thomas to you, sir.
TripleAxel over 9 years ago
I am sorry to see you disregard a sourced article, even given your factually incorrect opinion of the site’s founder. If you felt that any of the facts stated in the article were incorrect the best means of refuting it would be with accurate facts.-As it is, the article is accurate, which is consistent with my experience with breitbart.com. Here is a second article addressing the matter:-http://triblive.com/opinion/editorials/5831290-74/richardson-voting-fraud
renewed1 over 9 years ago
Actually researching a candidates record or the many proposals on a ballot requires time and money. Maybe this is why so many don’t do it? Does this also constitute a poll tax? Too bad that so many government offices require one to produce a picture id. They must all be racist as well.
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
Way back when, my brother came home and said the Brown folks were paying folks to go in and vote for Brown instead of Nixon for Governor. I went down to check it out, and yes, they were paying people to vote, but it was the NIXON folks paying for the votes… at last you don’t see that rampant a “fraud” out there today.
manteo16nc over 9 years ago
Faith-based liberal cartoon. Slur those you disagree with, and hope people are stupid enough to go along.