Tom the Dancing Bug by Ruben Bolling

Tom the Dancing Bug

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Mark

    Mark said, over 3 years ago

    And there you have it.

  2. Randy_B

    Randy_B GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    If your morality depends on whether you think you’re being watched, then you don’t have moral standards.

  3. kapock

    kapock said, over 3 years ago

    Speaking on behalf of the XL79Aπ-ians, you can have Him.

  4. Strike Joe

    Strike Joe said, over 3 years ago

    Jimmy Olsen wants his wardrobe back (and his logo font).

  5. steverino

    steverino said, over 3 years ago

    Without sin, there can be no forgiveness.

  6. webgrunt

    webgrunt said, over 3 years ago

    @Randy_B

    Maybe religion is good for psychotics, then?

  7. lafayetteann

    lafayetteann said, over 3 years ago

    @steverino

    Without a formalized category of ‘sin’, there is no need for a ritualized forgiveness.

    When we harm others, we should make restitution and seek forgiveness. A deity is not essential.

  8. Tommy1733

    Tommy1733 said, over 3 years ago

    I’m so sure Billy is blowing up an orphanage. I mean, come on!!

  9. wcorvi

    wcorvi said, over 3 years ago

    If I don’t sin, then Jesus died for NOTHING!

  10. JeepersCreepers

    JeepersCreepers said, over 3 years ago

    Something is wrong here…don’t you remember? God-Man doesn’t like Billy anymore because Billy called the Silver Wombat to save him when God-Man was away creating several trillion galaxies and it made God-Man jealous.
    Did they make up? Nobody told ME about it!

  11. Larry

    Larry said, over 3 years ago

    Your last sentence is an Eternal Truth.
    So simple and so obvious.
    R’Amen

  12. cmusicfan2000

    cmusicfan2000 said, over 2 years ago

    There have been judgmental comments on both sides of this discussion. comments like the one written by JPuzzleWhiz help no one on either side, so I ask everyone to please refrain from such unkind and pointless comments.

    That being said, my own personal opinion is that a right and wrong cannot exist without something to define it. If we are all equal, and there is no God above us, then why is my desire to live more important than a murderer’s desire to kill me? If your thinking that my desire to live is more important because murder is against the law, then we will have to look at how laws are created. If you believe that my right to live exists because the majority of people have decided that’s how it should be, then what would you say if the majority of people decided that killing off all mentally ill people would be good for society? Would that still be “moral”? I would hope that we could agree that it would not be, even if our culture and laws allowed and even encouraged it. Therefore, there must be something outside of culture, and outside of law, that defines a basic concept of right and wrong. Morality does not have a logical place in culture or law unless there is a perfect standard by which to measure that morality.

  13. Refresh Comments.