New Adventures of Queen Victoria by Pab Sungenis

New Adventures of Queen Victoria

Recommended

Comments (20) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Rista

    Rista said, about 1 year ago

    It was the alien, the one with the arms and the floppy ears, it looked like Jar Jar Binks. Nuff to turn me off the movie with out even seeing it.

  2. pcolli

    pcolli said, about 1 year ago

    I remember the John Carter books from when I was a kid. Not seen the film yet but I should imagine it’s over the top with CGI effects for the sake of it.

  3. pschearer

    pschearer said, about 1 year ago

    Jeez, the movie just came out! Is it that bad?


    Meantime, I noticed that “Princess of Mars” was on TV this weekend, another John Carter movie, starring Traci Lords (and if you don’t know her history, this is not the place where I’ll tell you).

  4. celecca

    celecca said, about 1 year ago

    cost about $250 million to make. Brought in about $30 mill. Was beat out by the Lorax (in its 2nd week) by about $4 million.

  5. ghostkeeper

    ghostkeeper said, about 1 year ago

    @celecca

    Ow. Ow ow ow. And the sad thing is, Avatar was just a re-imagining of John Carter of Mars, but I hear it made the money.

  6. kea

    kea said, about 1 year ago

    @celecca

    The Lorax had so many commercial tie-ins they could have shown it for free.

  7. masterskrain

    masterskrain said, about 1 year ago

    Well I have given up on “Movie Critics” and their reviews ever since gene Shalit of The Today Show roasted this little Science Fiction Movie back in 1977.
    He called it a total flop, and said that no one should waste their money going to see this film called “Star Wars”!
    OOPS!

  8. SUSAN NEWMAN

    SUSAN NEWMAN said, about 1 year ago

    The real irony is that the Best Picture Oscar was won by a silent, B&W movie that had no CG’s at all.

  9. bibliotechnique

    bibliotechnique said, about 1 year ago

    John Carter gets a 49% on the Tomatometer. See rottentomatoes.com for more info.

  10. scbaguru

    scbaguru said, about 1 year ago

    “The Artist” sucked more than “John Carter” which shows critics don’t know what they’re watching or they’re taking payola..

  11. DAZZ

    DAZZ said, about 1 year ago

    I love good animated cartoons, but refused my daughter’s offer to go to Avatar (characters are ugly!) I still plan to see Tangled even tho I missed it at Imax; I’ll get the 3D DVD.

  12. jerseyinsd

    jerseyinsd said, about 1 year ago

    weak box office for the opening of john carter, and most critics are comparing it to ishtar, which makes today’s strip impressive, since pab must have submitted it weeks ago!

  13. Stephen Gilberg

    Stephen Gilberg said, about 1 year ago

    @scbaguru

    I take it you’re not into old movies.

  14. nearsighted

    nearsighted said, about 1 year ago

    “John Carter” made $70 mil overseas. I think the jury is still on on whether nor not it’s a flop.

  15. scbaguru

    scbaguru said, about 1 year ago

    @ Stephen Gilberg: yes I am, ever since I took film arts in college… Big fan of Harold Lloyd, Lon ChaneySr.and Buster Keaton’s work to name a few. And of course, Chaplin.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (5).