Uhm, yes, United States law does recognize a difference between those simply crossing borders without documents (or coming here legally and overstaying a visa; or being brought here as infants by parents who crossed a border) and those seeking asylum because of a credible threat based on facts that can be documented in a court of law (most applications are rejected and most asylum-seekers are returned to their countries of origin).
U.S. law recognizes this difference. Does Steven Breen seriously NOT recognize it too?
Uhm, yes, United States law does recognize a difference between those simply crossing borders without documents (or coming here legally and overstaying a visa; or being brought here as infants by parents who crossed a border) and those seeking asylum because of a credible threat based on facts that can be documented in a court of law (most applications are rejected and most asylum-seekers are returned to their countries of origin).
U.S. law recognizes this difference. Does Steven Breen seriously NOT recognize it too?