Comments (28) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Peabody-Martini said, about 1 year ago

   Yelling in a echo chamber does not make a scandal. I’ve yet to see a shred of proof that the President or the Secretary of state are either culpable of events in Libya or have attempted to cover anything up. There is however plenty of evidence of malfeasance by Republican members of Congress and the media, particularly fox news in regards to this.
2. 

   mikefive said, about 1 year ago

   @Peabody-Martini

   “I’ve yet to see a shred of proof that the President or the Secretary of state are either culpable of events in Libya or have attempted to cover anything up.”
   •
   In Pickering’s report it isn’t the criticism that is so damning, but the recommendations. The progression of the revisions in the talking points memo does seem to indicate a strong desire to avoid expressing any responsibility for security shortcomings.
3. 

   Harleyquinn said, about 1 year ago

   Nice. Did you know the President of Libya was to Ticked off at our politicizing it and denying it was a terrorist attack like he said from day one that he would not let us into the "crime scene for over two weeks. My guess that is one reason why Clinton was the 1st to call it a terrorist attack 10 day later.
   Anyone else going to buy popcorn and watch when Clinton turns on Obama? Obama accounts have still not been made public yet Clinton is getting most of the heat. If she thinks he in anyway starts blaming her I am sure the claws will come out. Chicago politics vs The Clinton Machine.. FIGHT!
4. 

   Peabody-Martini said, about 1 year ago

   @Gore Bane

   That’s no proof of any wrongdoing by anyone in the administration. I read the article in question and it seems to be filled with the opinion of the author and not much else. Once again all sizzle and no steak. This is a Republican obsession, but if the Republican Party wants this nonstory to be the hill they die on much as Mitt Romney did before the last election I say they should keep right on going. But how do you think that the American public is going to react to Congress spending all of its time endlessly rehashing this issue when there are real problems in the country that need to be addressed. I must say that if you get what you seem to want here it will be very good election night in 2014 for the Democratic Party.
5. 

   Peabody-Martini said, about 1 year ago

   @Harleyquinn

   The President’s comments in the Rose Garden the morning after the attack. You and Mitt Romney both forgot about that. That more or less destroyed any chance that Mitt had in the election, as if he ever really stood a chance. Thank you for allowing me to bring up one of the greatest debate screw ups of all time. I would suggest that you do more than repeat RWNJ talking points.
6. 

   Peabody-Martini said, about 1 year ago

   @Gore Bane

   Yes, your hatred of the Democratic Party is all the proof you need. I forgot that it’s unfair of me to argue facts and logic against your opinion.
7. 

   lookinside said, about 1 year ago

   The GOP’s inability to compromise in the House will give the President a Democratic Congress in 2014 and most likely, forever.
8. 

   Robert Landers said, about 1 year ago

   @mikefive

   Does that report also allow for Congress cutting the funds for diplomatic security? A House of Representatives that cut the funds in order to make the current president look bad (their ONLY goal, certainly NOT to serve the people of the USA!) regardless of the negative consequences to the people of the USA, and the incredibly brave people that serve in our diplomatic core?
9. 

   Dry and Dusty said, about 1 year ago

   And in the meantime, 4 families still have no answers as to why or how or whose fault it was that their loved ones died senselessly. While you’re debating politics, think about them!
10. 

    Harleyquinn said, about 1 year ago

    @Peabody-Martini

    Obama said the next day the attack was an act of terrorism."
    -
    Let’s put this to rest once and for all.
    Obama NEVER, not once, ever in the Rose Garden speech said, “The Benghazi attack was an act of terrorism.” THAT would be calling the attack an act of terrorism. He never said, “This attack was done by terrorists.”
    .
    I’ll prove he didn’t say it by directly quoting him.
    .
    First he said
    .
    “Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi.”
    .
    Nothing here about terrorists or terrorism, just killed in “an attack”
    .
    “The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack.”
    .
    This time he goes so far as to say it’s an “outrageous” and “shocking” attack, but can’t say “terrorist”
    .
    “…we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people”
    Note how he uses the term “killers” ? Still can’t call them terrorists. And still “attacked"
    .
    “…this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya”
    .
    Still just an “attack” not “terrorist attack”
11. 

    Harleyquinn said, about 1 year ago

    @Peabody-Martini

    . Thank you for allowing me to bring up one of the greatest debate screw ups of all time. I would suggest that you do more than repeat RWNJ talking points.
    The only debate screw up was Mitt not calling out the so called "moderator for being a liar and in Obama’s back pocket. He should have told the lady off in more stern terms and gone on to show what a JOKE Obama is on the world stage.
12. 

    mikefive said, about 1 year ago

    @Robert Landers

    " A House of Representatives that cut the funds in order to make the current president look bad…"
    ♦
    To me that argument is purely political and specious. The House is Republican. The Senate is Democratic. The President is Democratic. All three had to OK that cut in funds. Also, the Pickering report does not excuse the fund cut for the denial of security in Benghazi, and does make some recommendations.
    •
    The criticism of the State Department is as much in the report’s recommendations as any where else.
    •
    “5. The Department should develop minimum security standards for occupancy of temporary facilities in high risk, high threat environments, and seek greater flexibility for the use of Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) sources of funding so that they can be rapidly made available for security upgrades at such facilities.”
    •
    “The support cell should work to expedite the approval and funding for establishing and operating the post, implementing physical security measures, staffing of security and management personnel, and providing equipment, continuing as conditions at the post require.Contingency Operations funding to respond to emerging security threats and vulnerabilities and operational requirements in high risk, high threat posts.
    •
    The following incidents are listed in the report:
    • March 18, 2012 – Armed robbery occurs at the British School in Benghazi.
    • March 22, 2012 – Members of a militia searching for a suspect fire their weapons near the SMC and attempt to enter.
    • April 2, 2012 – A UK armored diplomatic vehicle is attacked after driving into a local protest. The vehicle was damaged but occupants uninjured.
    • April 6, 2012 – A gelatina bomb (traditional homemade explosive device used for fishing) is thrown over the SMC north wall.
    • April 10, 2012 – An IED (gelatina or dynamite stick) is thrown at the motorcade of the UN Special Envoy to Libya in Benghazi.
    • April 26, 2012 – Special Mission Benghazi principal officer is evacuated from International Medical University (IMU) after a fistfight escalated to gunfire between Tripoli-based trade delegation security personnel and IMU security.
    • April 27, 2012 – Two South African nationals in Libya as part of U.S.-funded weapons abatement, unexploded ordnance removal and demining project are detained at gunpoint by militia, questioned and released.
    • May 22, 2012 – Benghazi International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) building struck by rocket propelled grenades (RPGs).
    • May 28, 2012 – A previously unknown organization, Omar Abdurrahman group, claims responsibility for the ICRC attack and issues a threat against the United States on social media sites.
    • June 6, 2012 – IED attack on the SMC. The IED detonates with no injuries but blows a large hole in the compound’s exterior wall. Omar Abdurrahman group makes an unsubstantiated claim of responsibility.
    • June 8, 2012 – Two hand grenades target a parked UK diplomatic vehicle in Sabha (800 km south of Benghazi).
    • June 11, 2012 – While in Benghazi, the British Ambassador’s convoy is attacked with an RPG and possible AK-47s. Two UK security officers are injured; the UK closes its mission in Benghazi the following day.
    • June 12, 2012 – An RPG attack is made on the ICRC compound in Misrata (400 km west of Benghazi).
    • June 18, 2012 – Protestors storm the Tunisian consulate in Benghazi.
    • July 29, 2012 – An IED is found on grounds of the Tibesti Hotel.
    • July 30, 2012 – Sudanese Consul in Benghazi is carjacked and driver beaten.
    • July 31, 2012 – Seven Iranian-citizen ICRC workers abducted in Benghazi.
    • August 5, 2012 – ICRC Misrata office is attacked with RPGs. ICRC withdraws its representatives from Misrata and Benghazi.
    • August 9, 2012 – A Spanish-American dual national NGO worker is abducted from the Islamic Cultural Center in Benghazi and released the same day.
    • August 20, 2012 – A small bomb is thrown at an Egyptian diplomat’s vehicle parked outside of the Egyptian consulate in Benghazi.
    •
    Under these circumstances, using funding as an excuse to not supply Benghazi with security is disingenuous.You could yell at me in caps if you desire, but you will not convince me that State was not negligent or criminally negligent for not supplying more security, let alone reducing security. If State had so desired, funds could have been made available for Benghazi.
13. 

    dtroutma said, about 1 year ago

    The photos in the ’toon just remind me of the thousands of IEDs and destroyed American equipment, and American lives, in Afghanistan and Iraq. Yup, nothing for "W"s folks to cover up. Oh, right, they had no warnings before 9/11/01, but still took action to prevent the attacks on New York and D.C., which of course, never happened…
14. 

    sclark55 said, about 1 year ago

    dtrout: what’d anybody try to cover up? I don’t remember Bush blowing anything off; he never said something pathetic like “What difference does it make?”
    .
    Don’t hit the girl, and don’t blame the black guy. Especially liberal girls and black guys.
15. 

    mskemple said, about 1 year ago

    @Peabody-Martini

    Stick your hypocritical liberal head in the sand and keep swilling martini’s!!!
16. Load the rest of the comments (13).