Comments (72) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Ms. Ima said, 4 months ago

   Makes a lib proud.
2. 

   sw10mm said, 4 months ago

   What a shame. Think what they could have been.
3. 

   Rx71Wm29 said, 4 months ago

   Really? And how many babies were “KILLED” by your refusal to adopt them since 1973?
4. 

   Kylie2112 said, 4 months ago

   Cool, would you rather pay for their welfare and food stamps?
5. 

   Jase99 said, 4 months ago

   Everyone is so “concerned” over a child’s welfare before it’s born, but how many give a flying fig about that child’s welfare after he or she is born? Many of the things our tax dollars pay for that “conservatives” so vehemently oppose help insure the children who are born have a chance of a half decent life.
   
   If you oppose both birth control and abortions, don’t complain about the cost of schools and welfare services.
6. 

   Clark Kent said, 4 months ago

   Look, breen, we males do not get pregnant, we are the cause of pregnancy, we have nothing to say about what a woman dcides to do about her pregnancy. Only women are qualified and entitled to decide. There are only 3 people on the supreme court entitled to decide: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. Only the women in the senate, the house and the state legislatures can decide. Only women judges in any lower court can decide. We males have nothing to say. We should stay silently on the sidelines watching and listening.
7. 

   Prof_Bleen said, 4 months ago

   Actually, zero babies killed since 1973, since fetuses aren’t babies. Please don’t pervert the English language like that, and let’s instead remember that the difference with Roe v. Wade is that what used to be dangerous, back-alley abortions are now safe and legal.
8. 

   cdward said, 4 months ago

   Learn how to take care of the ones who are actually alive before you worry about the ones which might become human beings some day.
9. 

   Ketira shena Pretarasedrin said, 4 months ago

   For once, Clark has it right: It is a Woman’s choice whether to bring the child to term or not. I , for one, am glad that Roe vs. Wade is here, as I’d rather see the practice regulated by the medical community than not at all.
   .
   Even though you males start things, we females have to provide for the child ourselves —sometimes even after it’s born.
   .
   P.S. to Howie: That’s only true if it’s done willingly. If it is forced on her, and she doesn’t want the child, then your statement is groundless.
10. 

    TheTrustedMechanic said, 4 months ago

    @HOWGOZIT

    Sure ZIT, and we all know that the woman’s body has a way to shut that whole thing down if she is not a willing partner. And if it doesn’t, well that pregnancy resulting from rape or incest is well, just a little gift from God. And if the woman dies during childbirth, which was medically certain during her pregnancy, well that’s just God’s will.
    

    
    And you being ignorant, well that’s just willful on your part.
    

    
    So do tell us, if you have one ounce of integrity why are you so hell bent on forcing parents who know they have no way to support a child into bearing that child but then you are adamant that those very same parents should not be assisted in supporting that very same child you forced them to bear? And don’t say you didn’t force them, that’s exactly what you want to do by forcing your religious beliefs upon others. Condoms break or leak, birth control pills or other measures by the woman fail due to no fault of her own. Sex is the strongest drive we humans have so abstinence is not a viable option, that is NOT how God made us. Your silence or avoidance of my question will serve as proof of your status as a mindless, ignorant troll.
11. 

    Bruce4671 said, 4 months ago

    @Rx71Wm29

    Uh let’s see ….hmmmm (counting here),,,, uh NONE.
12. 

    Bruce4671 said, 4 months ago

    @Kylie2112

    Gee, would I rather pay for welfare and food stamps? now let me think. Is that the only other choice I have? How about there not having been an unwanted pregnacy in the first place? Could you maybe have taught little boys and girls responsibility and the fact that sex may indeed lead to a baby an that the pair of them would be required to support that child and so it would be a good thing t for them to be in a position to do that BEFORE they ran off and humped like rabbits?
    <br.
    Nah, can’t deny the little darlings anything now can we.
    
    It just so much easier to get rid of the problem.
13. 

    Bruce4671 said, 4 months ago

    @Jase99

    Kind of a good point. Still you are mistaken that “conservatives” are opposed to the things that really help children who are born have a chance at a half decent life. Let’s start with a 2 parent family giving them a stable platform.
14. 

    DrCanuck said, 4 months ago

    @Bruce4671

    Once the young girl is pregnant, OF WHAT POSSIBLE USE is it to say, “Oh, gee; you should have been more responsible in the first place”?

    
    Like THAT solves anything?
15. 

    Bruce4671 said, 4 months ago

    @Clark Kent

    Gee you are so ignorant it hard to imagine. NOpe males don’t get pregnant. HOWEVER, males can and should be able to control their “urges”, recognize their responsibility should a child be conceived and participate wholeheartedly in the acts required to prevent that event.
    
    Sorry but that child is the combination of the two and while the woman shelters that life for the first 270 or so days the male contribution (or lack thereof) for the next 6574 or so days is imperative and can prove devastating if it is not there. So yes, males should have input.
16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (57).