Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly


Comments (13) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. primalcoach

    primalcoach said, over 2 years ago

    Makes sense to me!

  2. Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper)

    Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper) GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    LOL….now that is really a good one…I think I had that lawyer…He didn’t look anything like one of those good lookin Vikings type though…But he was very good at pillage and plunder…but it was me that got pillage and plundered…

  3. PocosDad

    PocosDad said, over 2 years ago

    Or maybe an MBA? It seems like the financiers on Wall St have been doing most of the plundering lately.

  4. westny77

    westny77 said, over 2 years ago

    You got the right idea kid.

  5. RootsInDM

    RootsInDM said, over 2 years ago

    Perhaps he was thinking of Hagar the Horrible.

  6. DixieNormous

    DixieNormous said, over 2 years ago


  7. Mourdac

    Mourdac said, over 2 years ago

    Most lawyers are honorary members of the firm ‘Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe’. Vikings wish they could plunder as effectively as lawyers.

  8. Sailor 46

    Sailor 46 said, over 2 years ago

    The Vikings had ethics, lawyers not so much. I once had one tell me his job was to ensure that his client was found not guilty, not to ensure that justice was done!

  9. GuiltyBystander

    GuiltyBystander said, over 2 years ago

    @Sailor 46

    I don’t have any more use for lawyers than you (or most of us) do, but defense attorneys are supposed to primarily be advocates for their clients…justice is secondary to them by necessity of their role. The best we can hope for is a defense attorney who refuses to represent a defendant they’re convinced is guilty.

  10. Sailor 46

    Sailor 46 said, over 2 years ago


    I personally believe that the belief that the defense’s job is to “get” their client “off” is a perversion of the system. I believe the real reason that the person being tried is required to have a lawyer is to ensure a “fair” trial. Neither the Defense or Prosecution should be allowed to circumvent the effort to give the defendant a “fair” trial. I’m a former Police Officer and fully understand that my view is somewhat “pie in the sky”. I have no problem of a not guilty finding if the person is not guilty of the crime, regardless of who it is. Justice should never be secondary, being an advocate is OK, preventing Justice by nefarious means is not. I see nothing wrong with a lawyer defending a guilty person, everyone should have legal representation to ensure a fair trail, not to get them “off” regardless of the truth.

  11. mshefler

    mshefler said, over 2 years ago

    @Sailor 46

    There’s a lot more prosecutorial misconduct than perhaps you realize. That’s why every defendant needs a good lawyer.

  12. DragonRydr

    DragonRydr said, over 2 years ago

    Either/or, same difference.

  13. Reality,really?

    Reality,really? said, over 2 years ago

    Hagar passed. No problem.

  14. Refresh Comments.