Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly


Comments (29) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. nazzofoggenmach

    nazzofoggenmach GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    and when he’s not driving he moonlights as a barber

  2. Nabuquduriuzhur

    Nabuquduriuzhur said, over 1 year ago

    Freedom of speech has been consistently ruled as also the right of an individual not to listen to a given speech by the Supreme court. It’s not shutting the other person up; its’ simply not listening, such as leaving the area. Exercise your right, Shoe, and cover your ears…

  3. Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper)

    Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper) said, over 1 year ago

    Next time just fly yourself Shoe…

  4. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, over 1 year ago

    Your right to free speech vs my right not to give a *&$% what you think.

  5. AshburnStadium

    AshburnStadium said, over 1 year ago

    I interpret the Second Amendment, which reads as follows, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” as meaning that all gun owners should be required to belong to the National Guard (a well-regulated militia) and use their own weapons in combat.

  6. wcorvi

    wcorvi said, over 1 year ago


    I was WONDERING when someone would notice that!

  7. treesareus

    treesareus said, over 1 year ago


    Firearms ownership has been recognized as an individual right by the Supreme Court. Most individuals today don’t understand the language used in the late 1700s, hence the misunderstanding of the militia issue. The 100 million citizen gun owners are the militia and well regulated is only necessary when they are put to use. They are well regulated since the vast majority do not break laws.

  8. DaBoogadie

    DaBoogadie said, over 1 year ago


    But what happens when Big Business frightens the masses into buying big guns and then convinces both sides that the other is out to take their rights away?

    Do you feel well regulated?

  9. JPuzzleWhiz

    JPuzzleWhiz said, over 1 year ago

    That is one gabby cabbie!

  10. YokohamaMama

    YokohamaMama said, over 1 year ago


    I like the way you think.

  11. midaswelby

    midaswelby said, over 1 year ago


    Questions about the intent of the framers of the Constitution can be answered by reading their other documents, such as the Federalist Papers. It is better to read and have an informed opinion than to simply counter what is already established as fact.

  12. Charles Smith

    Charles Smith said, over 1 year ago


    Let us know if you ever get your head out of your butt. Your idea would completely negate the purpose of the 2nd Amendment.

  13. Charles Smith

    Charles Smith said, over 1 year ago


    Good calrification. Thanks.

  14. Charles Smith

    Charles Smith said, over 1 year ago


    How about you? Do you feel conspiratorial? Or just paranoid.

  15. Jeff H

    Jeff H said, over 1 year ago

    Hey, Shoe: stop yer complainin’…at least your cabbie can speak English.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (14).