Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly


Comments (21) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. nazzofoggenmach

    nazzofoggenmach said, about 3 years ago

    and when he’s not driving he moonlights as a barber

  2. Nabuquduriuzhur

    Nabuquduriuzhur said, about 3 years ago

    Freedom of speech has been consistently ruled as also the right of an individual not to listen to a given speech by the Supreme court. It’s not shutting the other person up; its’ simply not listening, such as leaving the area. Exercise your right, Shoe, and cover your ears…

  3. Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper)

    Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper) GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    Next time just fly yourself Shoe…

  4. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, about 3 years ago

    Your right to free speech vs my right not to give a *&$% what you think.

  5. AshburnStadium

    AshburnStadium said, about 3 years ago

    I interpret the Second Amendment, which reads as follows, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” as meaning that all gun owners should be required to belong to the National Guard (a well-regulated militia) and use their own weapons in combat.

  6. wcorvi

    wcorvi said, about 3 years ago


    I was WONDERING when someone would notice that!

  7. treesareus

    treesareus said, about 3 years ago


    Firearms ownership has been recognized as an individual right by the Supreme Court. Most individuals today don’t understand the language used in the late 1700s, hence the misunderstanding of the militia issue. The 100 million citizen gun owners are the militia and well regulated is only necessary when they are put to use. They are well regulated since the vast majority do not break laws.

  8. JPuzzleWhiz

    JPuzzleWhiz said, about 3 years ago

    That is one gabby cabbie!

  9. YokohamaMama

    YokohamaMama said, about 3 years ago


    I like the way you think.

  10. midaswelby

    midaswelby said, about 3 years ago


    Questions about the intent of the framers of the Constitution can be answered by reading their other documents, such as the Federalist Papers. It is better to read and have an informed opinion than to simply counter what is already established as fact.

  11. Doctor Toon

    Doctor Toon said, about 3 years ago


    I always interpreted that wording the same way but there is a huge gap between that interpretation and the way gun laws stand today

    I say the gun rights people should accept that there will be some level of regulation on guns and be glad the Supreme Court didn’t chose that interpretation many years ago when they had the chance

  12. Stuart Gathman

    Stuart Gathman said, about 3 years ago


    The writers of the constitution actually explicitly defined “militia”:

    It is not the National Guard (or even a State Defense Force

  13. whitet3260

    whitet3260 said, about 3 years ago

    Well – our government is doing what it can to remedy that freedom of speech.

  14. ProfessorKid

    ProfessorKid said, about 3 years ago

    “I had the right to remain silent, but not the ability!”
    - Ron White.

  15. Travis

    Travis said, about 3 years ago


    Exactly, and all able bodied men/persons are by statute, members of the militia. It is that way by law here in Texas anyway.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (6).