Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly

Shoe

Comments (26) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. nazzofoggenmach

    nazzofoggenmach GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    and when he’s not driving he moonlights as a barber

  2. Nabuquduriuzhur

    Nabuquduriuzhur said, about 1 year ago

    Freedom of speech has been consistently ruled as also the right of an individual not to listen to a given speech by the Supreme court. It’s not shutting the other person up; its’ simply not listening, such as leaving the area. Exercise your right, Shoe, and cover your ears…

  3. Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper)

    Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper) said, about 1 year ago

    Next time just fly yourself Shoe…

  4. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, about 1 year ago

    Your right to free speech vs my right not to give a *&$% what you think.

  5. AshburnStadium

    AshburnStadium said, about 1 year ago

    I interpret the Second Amendment, which reads as follows, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” as meaning that all gun owners should be required to belong to the National Guard (a well-regulated militia) and use their own weapons in combat.

  6. wcorvi

    wcorvi said, about 1 year ago

    @AshburnStadium

    I was WONDERING when someone would notice that!

  7. treesareus

    treesareus said, about 1 year ago

    @AshburnStadium

    Firearms ownership has been recognized as an individual right by the Supreme Court. Most individuals today don’t understand the language used in the late 1700s, hence the misunderstanding of the militia issue. The 100 million citizen gun owners are the militia and well regulated is only necessary when they are put to use. They are well regulated since the vast majority do not break laws.

  8. DaBoogadie

    DaBoogadie said, about 1 year ago

    @treesareus

    But what happens when Big Business frightens the masses into buying big guns and then convinces both sides that the other is out to take their rights away?

    Do you feel well regulated?

  9. JPuzzleWhiz

    JPuzzleWhiz said, about 1 year ago

    That is one gabby cabbie!

  10. YokohamaMama

    YokohamaMama said, about 1 year ago

    @AshburnStadium

    I like the way you think.

  11. midaswelby

    midaswelby said, about 1 year ago

    @AshburnStadium

    Questions about the intent of the framers of the Constitution can be answered by reading their other documents, such as the Federalist Papers. It is better to read and have an informed opinion than to simply counter what is already established as fact.

  12. Jeff H

    Jeff H said, about 1 year ago

    Hey, Shoe: stop yer complainin’…at least your cabbie can speak English.

  13. Doctor Toon

    Doctor Toon said, about 1 year ago

    @AshburnStadium

    I always interpreted that wording the same way but there is a huge gap between that interpretation and the way gun laws stand today


    I say the gun rights people should accept that there will be some level of regulation on guns and be glad the Supreme Court didn’t chose that interpretation many years ago when they had the chance

  14. Stuart Gathman

    Stuart Gathman said, about 1 year ago

    @wcorvi

    The writers of the constitution actually explicitly defined “militia”:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=george+mason+militia+means+all+the+people

    It is not the National Guard (or even a State Defense Force https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_defense_force

  15. gmartin997

    gmartin997 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Not to mention the freedom of the unfettered press.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (11).