Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly

Shoe

Comments (22) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. alcors3

    alcors3 said, about 2 years ago

    Page 30045792 Obummercare.

  2. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Reverse the Republican Part D plan to screw folks over on drug prices, pretty easy to do, if they just would.

  3. poppy1313

    poppy1313 said, about 2 years ago

    And you can smoke some medication

  4. Nabuquduriuzhur

    Nabuquduriuzhur said, about 2 years ago

    re:poppy1313

    I lived in a state where pot was legal. (From 1973-1997). It was a disaster. Most of the women I went to high school with ended up as addicts and on public assistance.

    Back in the 1980s, it was normal for people to smoke pot, then pick up “causes” so they could get together to party. As an example, I was invited once (turned it down politely) to go to an “environmental” “festival” in Eugene. The real goal of those going to it was to get stoned and to “get laid.” That has been typical of “causes” unfortunately— an excuse to get loaded and to “get laid.”

    BLECH!

  5. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    @Nabuquduriuzhur

    You’re a stone drag.

  6. DaBoogadie

    DaBoogadie said, about 2 years ago

    @Nabuquduriuzhur

    I live in Colorado…..enough said.

  7. edinbaltimore

    edinbaltimore GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Typical rightie. Let’s tar everybody with the same brush, or make irrelevant comments about Obamacare. Shrub pushed through the Part D, with NO way to actually pay for it, with a Donuy Hole at a certain point which costs seniors more, and with NO LEEWAY for Medicare to negotiate with the drug companies. One of the benefits of Ocare is closing the Donut Hole over time. Still having obstruction over negotiating for prices!

  8. edinbaltimore

    edinbaltimore GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    By the way, under Ryan’s proposed health care “plan”:, I would qualify, but my wife would not. If it’s that damned good, make it available NOW!

  9. tinteardrop

    tinteardrop said, about 2 years ago

    “The problem that we’ve created is that the ‘cost of healthcare’ has nothing to do with the cost of healthcare”

  10. kea

    kea said, about 2 years ago

    @Rad-ish

    I’ll second that. He makes me want to repeal the 1st amendment.

  11. galanti

    galanti said, about 2 years ago

    Answer: Fishers
    Question: Where would Nebulizer live if he lived in Indiana? (Reason – the “stupid letters, the really stupid, the My God I hope these people don’t breed stupid letters” to the Indianapolis Star come from people who live in Fishers, IN.

  12. oldman2013

    oldman2013 said, about 2 years ago

    they want you to buy a 3 months supply cheaper in bulk

  13. 1after909

    1after909 said, about 2 years ago

    @edinbaltimore

    Typical leftie. Generalize, tar everybody with the same brush, AND make irrelevant comments. As for Obummercare, TANSTAAFL.

  14. route66paul

    route66paul said, about 2 years ago

    Truth be known, the drug companies would love to lower the cost of their drugs – if they could get protection from lawsuits.

    like workman’s comp, insurance that limits the injured worker to a much lower standard.

  15. dfowensby

    dfowensby said, about 2 years ago

    @route66paul

    Can we say Thalidomide? No drug company gets “protection” from irresponsibility.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (7).