Scott Stantis by Scott Stantis

Scott Stantis

Comments (30) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, 11 months ago

    Only the insane and hopelessly deluded would have expected the Obamantion’s plan to work.

  2. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, 11 months ago

    The Death Chair

  3. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    How much is this costing the tax payer again? Sad thing is most Obamapologist will not admit to this was a failure from the start, we are seeing the failure unfold in front of us and it will be a failure in the history books. But don’t tell those that got their free Obamaphones after they signed up.

  4. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, 11 months ago

    If you believe that such a large program would just start up without problems, then you are indeed deluded. This would be so even in private industry! But, it does not mean that the program itself is a failure, it needs both work and some time. Something that the tea party types are not willing to do, as they do not wish to just modify the program as it goes along for greater efficiency, the just want to kill it without even having ANY kind of replacement at all.
    <p.

    And of course our current program is so good. It is rated as the 38th best in the world by the world health organization, we are right behind that great industrial power of Costa Rica. But we are number one in one area, ours is the costliest in the world. So, I do not see just how we can get much more costly than that with the ACA program!!

  5. ARodney

    ARodney said, 11 months ago

    It was a lousy rollout, but it’ll be working fine by the time people need to sign up. And anyone who has noticed how Romneycare works in Massachusetts knows it will work just fine. It sure works better than the old system of “buy insurance, and if you get sick, they are free to not cover you, drop your policy, and you and your family go bankrupt, lose your house, and end up on the taxpayer’s dime.”

  6. mikefive

    mikefive said, 11 months ago

    @Robert Landers

    “And of course our current program is so good. It is rated as the 38th best in the world by the world health organization,”

    I read the study from which that 38th ranking came from and consider it flawed. It wasn’t the criteria that made me come to that conclusion but the way they ranked the various categories. As they went through the categories they assigned a number rating to that category. When it came to a category that involved socialized medicine, they used a multiple of two or three to boost the raw score to a higher score. It struck me as a questionable way to give something a high score. If a particular category was so good, why not give it a higher raw score (rhetorical)? Without the use of those multiples, I don’t know whether we would be third, thirtieth, or thirty-eighth.

  7. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    Funny! thanks for the giggle!
    “just glitches” “Apple had some problems with their roll out”
    Sure, But Apple did not wait till after the last election to write most of the code. A glitch is something that can be fixed. This is fundamentally flawed! Hey kids you can spend a thousand or so on some very bad, very high deductible insurance you think you do not need. Or we the government will hit you with a tax/penalty out of that magical refund check. A whole 95$ the 1st year. Now we need 7 million of mostly young healthy people or even Obama admits it will fail. Hey what could go wrong.
    push ker chunk, the 1st trillion, push ker chunk, 2 trillion, push 3 trillion, hey were we not promised before it was read that this would cost under a trillion. push ker chunk, hey I thought i could keep my doctor, push ker chunk, What is this 1000$ new bill, was not the price to go down 25%….

  8. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, 11 months ago

    @Harleyquinn

    “How much is this costing the tax payer”?


    The total cost is not altogether clear, but to within about $1, the total cost as of current date is $0.


    The government is shut, only essential functions like the NSA reading all your e-mails and drones killing goatherds to prove the US is tough on terrorism are funded. The ACA computers are all workingrunning because they’re NOT using any US government money, they’re all paid for by the insurance companies’ marketing budgets.

  9. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, 11 months ago

    @Robert Landers

    You’re quite right. We all remember that Google was a complete disaster for the first couple of years, to the extent so many people were put off by the problems that, even today, almost no one uses that system.

  10. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    @ARodney who has noticed how Romneycare works in Massachusetts knows it will work just fine."

    If the ACA was anything like what they have it might have had a chance. But i for one do not live nor want to live in such a State with those high of taxes to pay for it. Neither does most everyone from the look of it. Plus If ACA is so good why then do you have a tax/penalty and the IRS to enforce it? Yes Mass. has the high taxes collected but you can move. The only way to avoid Obamacare is to move out of Country or just make no money so therefore no refund check to hold over your head. Do they have that in Mass.? No? So you are just spreading yet another liberal Lie about Obamacare? Just like all the LIES Obama told you about his legacy, the only thing he managed to pass, This ACA has been one LIE after another!

  11. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    @Michael wme

    LIE!
    http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/obamacare-healthcare-gov-website-cost/

    And we are talking about debt. If it did not cost anything then why is Obama willing to shut everything down to fund it? Why is it that talking it out of the budget things are much easier to balance?
    You LIE very well liberal Obamapologist.

  12. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    @Michael wme

    The total cost is not altogether clear, but to within about $1, the total cost as of current date is $0."
    Well they did save money by hiring
    “Navigators” that will not be covered under the policies they will be hocking. Obama did give out a few..thousand wavers. So you have half the money right. Those that could pay off Obama have paid nothing into this system yet. But money has been flowing.

  13. Mark Stanger

    Mark Stanger GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    “Resources are not available, at this time, for ‘non-productive’ members of society. such procedures as you require to enjoy your retirement must be allocated for younger, working members of the population. Here’s a pill. Here’s your sign!”

  14. Enoki

    Enoki said, 11 months ago

    I thought the wheels were triangular because they eliminated one bump over the previous system!

  15. ODon

    ODon said, 11 months ago

    @Debt Free

    “Just another entitlement program that everyone will pay for themselves and another person.”
    Yes, that works.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (15).