Pat Oliphant by Pat Oliphant

Pat Oliphant

Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Richard S. Russell

    Richard S. Russell GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    So, did this remind anyone else of the Odessa Steps scene from Sergei Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin ?
       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLEE2UL_N7Q

  2. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, about 2 years ago

    @Clark Kent

    Personally, I think that “Daddy” China has lost all reasonable control of its “baby”. And saving face may just be the least of Daddies problems!!

  3. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    China lost control when N.K. got themselves nuclear weapons. Suddenly they have a dangerous neighbor instead of a willing buffer state.

  4. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    China wants their money back and they are using Kim as a wedge.

  5. omQ R

    omQ R said, about 2 years ago

    And while you’re doing that, lose your veto powers in the Perm. Security Council.


    3rd world rabble indeed. Gotta laugh when only 5 members in the U.N. have a veto right and then a citizen of one of those members declares the rest of the world “rabble”. Have your cake and eat it.


    The term “3rd world” came about because of the U.N. It represented the non-aligned nations who were not with either the NATO/Western countries (1st world) or Communist nations (2nd world). But I’m pretty sure you didn’t mean that at all. Just what has now become a pejorative term.

  6. Godfreydaniel

    Godfreydaniel said, about 2 years ago

    This one was really good although maybe it could’ve been even funnier if Baby Dictator was sucking on a nuke bottle or pacifier!

  7. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 2 years ago

    Been hearing a little that China has lost control of little Un.

  8. SABRSteve

    SABRSteve said, about 2 years ago

    NK doesn’t fear the US because they see us as a paper tiger run by a weak president.

  9. Rickapolis

    Rickapolis said, about 2 years ago

    So, what we seem to have from the wingnuts here is a desire for a pre-emptive nuclear strike. Just like what they are accusing the North Koreans of doing. Do you get the fallacy there, nut jobs?
    The colossal ignorance of some posters here is pathetic.

  10. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 2 years ago

    Speaking of a paper tiger run by a weak president: I seem to remember a few planes crashing into buildings a little more than a decade ago. That would not have happened if there hadn’t been a simpleton in the White House. How quickly we forget.

  11. Fuzzy Thinker (I)

    Fuzzy Thinker (I) GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    NK is doing exactly what China wants it to do. Read ‘The Art of War’. The show would be over tomorrow if China stopped aid to NK.

  12. TheTruthHurts

    TheTruthHurts said, about 2 years ago

    @Rickapolis

    The adage of, ’ Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6 ’ is spot-on in this case.

  13. TheTruthHurts

    TheTruthHurts said, about 2 years ago

    @TheTruthHurts

    1st strike does NOT have to be NUKE. Glad I don’t live in Hawaii !

  14. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, about 2 years ago

    @SABRSteve

    But we have some 30,000 troops there in harms way. If NK attacks SK then a great many of those troops are going to either die or be badly wounded. Do you even begin to think that the President that actually got Osama Bin Laden is going to be able to just ignore that? He would be impeached by even his own party!! Let us hope that NK even with all of its childish threats, does not forget that!!

  15. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, about 2 years ago

    @Rickapolis

    Agree totally, and I live on the supposedly vulnerable West Coast of the US. I would not even like to see the US use Nukes, unless NK did first (and I do not even think they have the current ability to reach Hawaii, let alone the West Coast. And attack, conventional or otherwise is going to fall on South Korea, but if the nut-jobs of NK think they could just do a walk over in even that, they are going to find out the hard way that the world does not allow that sort of thing anymore. Internationalism would not stand for it alone, even if the US would (which it would not, otherwise we would now be removing the 30,000 remaining American ground forces from harms way in South Korea, and that is not happening)!!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (2).