Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller

Non Sequitur

Comments (63) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Caddy57

    Caddy57 said, over 2 years ago

    The second amendment “was” the right to bear arms….or is Wiley right ? either way arming bears sounds more dangerous!

  2. Three Steps Over Japan

    Three Steps Over Japan said, over 2 years ago

    I’ve long argued that deer have the significant advantage, what with those pointy head things they have on their heads. It’s only fair that bears should be allowed to even the playing field with full-auto rifles and armor piercing explosive rounds. It’s why I also advocate selling tanks to anyone who wants to fish for salmon. And hand grenades for those disadvantaged paint ball players.

  3. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, over 2 years ago

    Why do hunters need assault rifles? Are the deer packing Uzis?

  4. Darsan54

    Darsan54 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    The NRA (world’s largest terrorist organization) is all for this development; more guns sold by the manufacturers. Grizzly with an AR-15 – Kewl !!!

  5. Darsan54

    Darsan54 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @Three Steps Over Japan

    Really ! If it’s a sport, shouldn’t both sides have an equal footing? Whitetails with RPGs !!

  6. cessna172

    cessna172 said, over 2 years ago

    and shawks with lasers

  7. Varnes

    Varnes said, over 2 years ago

    Our first ladie’s outfits almost always have bare arms…she’s a second amendment cutie….

  8. BillWa

    BillWa said, over 2 years ago

    Actually it’s not. It’s quite clear and concise.
    What we have here is the right to keep and arm bears, not keep and bear arms.

  9. unnormal

    unnormal said, over 2 years ago

    Bears are naturally armed . . . they carry them in their mouths and on the ends of their (fingers and ?) toes.

  10. hariseldon59

    hariseldon59 said, over 2 years ago

  11. ragtime78rpm

    ragtime78rpm said, over 2 years ago

    This always escalates so fast. Although you’re correct that the irony is that someone’s finally taking UMBRAGE at the lying — not the lying itself, in which you bible-denying climate-change proponents are always engaged.

  12. HippyChippy

    HippyChippy said, over 2 years ago

    How many so called hunters would go hunting if they knew that the prey could shoot back. Go bears Go.

  13. cdward

    cdward said, over 2 years ago


    As long as you’re in a well-regulated (ie., state) militia. That’s how they initially interpreted it. That’s also why all able-bodied men were required to be part of a state militia. That’s the provisional clause of the amendment. Don’t forget that part.

  14. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Due to the widespread escalation of hostilities on the internet, the Right to Free Speech is being reviewed, and may be limited only to properly licensed members of the press.
    Because that certainly must be what the Founders intended.

  15. pcolli

    pcolli said, over 2 years ago

    If the bears were there before “the White Man”, surely they have the right to representation?

  16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (48).