Non Sequitur is Wiley Miller's wry look at the absurdities of everyday life. A hit with fans of all ages, the strip is syndicated in more than 700 newspapers. Non Sequitur has received four National Cartoonists Society divisional awards, the most prestigious in cartooning. It is the only comic strip to win the coveted award in its first year of syndication and the only one to ever win in both the best comic strip and best comic panel categories.
This hilarious creation is not only creative but also clever. It tackles current cultural issues such as politics, celebrities, male-female relations, materialistic desires and society's obsession with weight. Non Sequitur will have you laughing at the controversy of everyday life.
Collectible Prints:
Collectible Prints are always available for all editions. Original art is available on a first-come, first-served basis. Just contact Wiley Miller for either.
Information on Non Sequitur original art: Upon availability, the original art sells for $375 for a daily edition, and $500 for a Sunday edition.
All original art, including most Sunday editions, are in black & white line art (color in newspapers is done in a separate process).
Information on prints:
Prints are available (black and white only) for any edition of Non Sequitur for $75 each.
Most Sunday editions are available in color prints for $150 each.
All prints are on high quality, 11" x 14" cardstock, suitable for framing.
If you would like to have either a print or original personally inscribed, please include a note indicating who it is to inscribed for. Otherwise, the work will NOT be signed.
© Wiley - All Rights Reserved.
New Adventures of Queen Victoria by Pab Sungenis
The Norm Classics by Michael Jantze
Comments (41) (Please sign in to comment)
Orion said, about 1 year ago
SPOT ON.
Orion
Varnes said, about 1 year ago
Or agenda?..Ask Monroe….I believe his vet was Doc Trine…
NightShade09 said, about 1 year ago
Obviously, he hasn’t got the right connections.
Radish
said, about 1 year ago
Don’t steal, the government doesn’t like competition.
GuiltyBystander said, about 1 year ago
No no no: When the government does it, it’s called "Social Security; when WE do it, it’s called a “Ponzi Scheme.” At least Bernie Madoff’s victims had the choice to say no.
revisages said, about 1 year ago
if only you’d come all the way up to seeing it as dogma, buddy
gmartin997
said, about 1 year ago
@GuiltyBystander
Don’t worry. You’ll get your turn, if you live long enough and it doesn’t go broke. Of course that might mean having to work until you’re 70 and start paying in a little more. Consider it delayed gratification. I paid into it for 55 years, helping to support retirees who had gone before me. I didn’t complain.
INGSOC
said, about 1 year ago
We must have Danae here with all of us, she would figure out a much better solution….
Arch Stanton said, about 1 year ago
Manifest destiny is neither a man, nor a fest.
psychlady said, about 1 year ago
You got that right!!
zoidknight said, about 1 year ago
@gmartin997
Sadly. now it only goes to pay the pension fund for Congress.
hariseldon59 said, about 1 year ago
“If the President does it, it’s not illegal.”- Richard Nixon
TheTrustedMechanic said, about 1 year ago
@gmartin997
I would not be happy about an extended retirement age or higher contributions. However, if Social Security were managed as it should have been, and it could not have been even if the bureaucrats had wanted to, we would have a retirement age of around 70 now anyway and most likely would not have had to pay in much more than we do currently. But precisely because of that mismanagement, demanded by the selfish of the era, we have the crisis we are now facing with this “entitlement.” You see when Social Security was enacted the life expectancy was near the retirement age as it was then. So the anticipated benefit period was only a few years, not a couple decades as it is now. Do I want to work until I’m dead? No, but I expect to anyway, even with Social Security. Social Security has been mismanaged almost from the beginning, but that is not solely the fault of the government. Here is an example of the government doing the will of the people. The people were unwilling to pay the costs of the government they were demanding. They demanded all that plus lower taxes than were required. So to make the budgets look balanced Social Security was transferred to the general budget to make the excess is SS look like revenue on the budget and creating the illusion of a balanced or nearly balanced budget, thus stealing from future retirees. Ironically the very same retirees who are now screaming “Don’t cut MY benefits,” while simultaneously “worrying” about the debt we (they actually) are leaving our children. Where was their concern in the ‘60’s, ‘70’s and early ‘80’s?
.
With the increased life expectancy the retirement age should be increased. But it should also be taken into account the disparate life expectancies for the wealthy (with access to excellent healthcare) and that of the working citizen who has limited access even with excellent employer provided health insurance. Studies have shown that the wealthy who can afford better quality food, better healthcare and have the luxury of the time to seek that healthcare will live longer than the working class citizen who has to struggle to take time off to go to the doctor much less undergo any treatment (while risking losing their job and insurance because of their condition and the increased cost to the employer for that healthcare). Am I bashing the wealthy here? No I am simply expressing a reality and asking that the reality be acknowledged when and if the retirement age is increased, as it seems to be doing.
icky mudd said, about 1 year ago
@TheTrustedMechanic
i’m a retired mechanic,and thank you for expressing what i’ve been thinking and espousing for years.
Well said.
Clark Kent said, about 1 year ago
@GuiltyBystander
I’m on Social Security. I’m getting back money that I and my former employer paid in to it. I’m getting back MY money, not the government’s money.
………………………………..
As for the ’toon, the “gummint” imprisons people for not telling it the truth while the “gummint” lies to us about everything.