Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   dtroutma said, 2 months ago

   Yes on panel one, no to panel two. Is Rand Paul actually the one-eyed man in the land of the blind? (well, not really but at least he was first to use a cane.)
2. 

   pirate227 said, 2 months ago

   Interesting analogy…
3. 

   Radish said, 2 months ago

   Just a political stunt which amounted to nothing.
4. 

   ahab said, 2 months ago

   www.RightWingWatch.org
5. 

   ahab said, 2 months ago

   ^search word; filibuster, ahem.
6. 

   mikefive said, 2 months ago

   @ahab

   Ahab, that site is one of the worst sites I’ve ever seen! I’m not even sure true believers would go for that one.
7. 

   Bruce4671 said, 2 months ago

   @mikefive

   True believers in what exactly? Everyone is entitled to their opinion but perhaps some should be less visible… LOL
   
   
8. 

   Bruce4671 said, 2 months ago

   @Radish

   Yeh…just the response he asked for and Holder wouldn’t give a straight answer to until AFTER the filibuster. And Rand did it the old fashion way, as it should be done.
   
   Tell me, does it not concern you when the head of the DOJ hems and haws about the answer to a simple question like Is the president authorized under the constitution to kill a US citizen on US soil who is only “suspected” of maleficence?
   
   Shouldn’t he have been able to – without pause – say unequivocally a resounding NO? But he had to go ask Barry before he could write the letter…. a day later.
9. 

   mikefive said, 2 months ago

   @Bruce4671

   I heard something recently that I’ll have to paraphrase. “Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but not to their own facts.” And that site definitely has its own facts.
10. 

    Rockngolfer said, 2 months ago

    @Bruce4671

    So you want an Attornry General that answers questions without thinking?
11. 

    ahab said, 2 months ago

    @mikefive

    I know, but it raises no questions about Obama’s birth certificate.
12. 

    tundrasea said, 2 months ago

    @Rockngolfer

    How about an AG that doesn’t require a day to say whether it’s O.K. to assassinate Americans on U.S. soil — when they are not posing an immediate threat?
13. 

    Adrian Snare said, 2 months ago

    The filibuster should be replaced with intelligent discourse between gentlemen.
14. 

    Adrian Snare said, 2 months ago

    I quickly examined the site “Right Wing…..”
    Instead of “telling the truth……”, they simply counter conservative philosophy…
    Which am I to believe ?
15. 

    coraryan said, 2 months ago

    @Rockngolfer

    I don’t think any of Owebama’s people know how to think.
16. Load the rest of the comments (2).