Nick Anderson by Nick Anderson

Nick Anderson

Comments (9) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ODon

    ODon said, almost 4 years ago

    Nick chalk’s up another good "toon.

  2. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    0.08 is an illegal amount of alcohol (number of “rounds”) in the blood for driving, or positive proof you are "lethal’ on the road, in a motor vehicle that is NOT intended to kill. Why NOT limit the number of rounds in a firearm that IS intended to kill?

  3. zippy06

    zippy06 said, almost 4 years ago

    Why not just make the cops do their jobs?
    Why not fire eric holder?
    Zero FELONS have been convicted of violating the “Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act”!
    This has been going on for how many yrs????
    Since 1994.

  4. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, almost 4 years ago

    All you libs that think this is a good toon can’t think. Which one of the gun laws is lax? But don’t let your brain get in the way of those oh-so-precious feelings of yours.

  5. Ken M

    Ken M GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    @dtroutma: we can lower the amount of alcohol allowed in the blood to zero and it still will not stop someone from getting behind the wheel. We can make the cans and bottles smaller and it still will not stop. Again… treating they symptom and not the cause… the liberal way. Besides, your analogy has nothing to do with the argument on guns. There’s this little thing called the 2nd Amendment that has to be addressed, and in the proper manner set forth by the Constitution, which provides the basis of our laws.

  6. wbr

    wbr said, almost 4 years ago

    Real caption

    raise your hand if you wished gun laws allowed you to have one

  7. Joseph

    Joseph GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    America doesn’t have lax gun laws. We have many. They are being ignored by people who mean to do harm. Stop blaming millions of Americans; that’s lazy. Show courage and blame the few bad people.

  8. parkerfields

    parkerfields GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    Sorry to disappoint the liberals, but police generally do not protect. They arrive after it is too late. The only protection most people have is a gun. If there is no gun, a hammer, a baseball bat, or some other weapon. Contrary to how the news media portrays things, guns are for killing when you are a hunter, and they are for protection if you are not a hunter. I am much saver having a gun for protection, rather than the false safety people think they have because you can call 911 and in ten to fifteen minutes, the police will arrive. That ten to fifteen minutes are an eternity when you are in danger with no weapon to protect yourself. Guns protect. Liberal criminals want to commit their crimes without fear of facing a weapon.

  9. Fpk40

    Fpk40 said, almost 4 years ago

    All I can really say – get the criminals to put down the weapons first and I will gladly give mine up. I have used mine to protect my family and others. If I did not have one the guy would NOT have stopped..period. So I saved a lady that absolutely hates guns but was oddly enough very happy I had mine. So I guess a liberal is only against guns when their life is not in danger. Much like the rant from Germany, take a long look at the years before all this started to happen. Guns were around and no one did all of this. So is it society media glorifying the violence? Lack of morals and spending time with kids to know their issues and help teach nonviolent solutions? Lets take a look into the past and see why it did not happen and see what changed today. So lax gun laws and being hard on owners of guns isn’t the solution. Look at Chicago over 500 kids are killed each year, media does not pick it up because its “normal” and its one or two at a time and they have tough gun control. Education, love, family bring back moral values might be the solution.

  10. Refresh Comments.