Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   win said, about 1 year ago

   If we could only stop shooting each other.
2. 

   J. Short said, about 1 year ago

   Let the commentary begin. Try to play nice everyone.
3. 

   treesareus said, about 1 year ago

   Prohibition of alcohol failed. Prohibition of drugs has failed. Neither of them were protected under the Constitution. Prohibition of guns will be a bigger failure, since people have seen what happened in other parts of the world when citizens are stripped of their guns.
4. 

   DDS029 said, about 1 year ago

   @J. Short

   I’m just glad I got in early today, so I can just move on. Not enough comments to get me even interested in playing today.
5. 

   Justice22 said, about 1 year ago

   This administration does not call for the confiscation of guns. In effect it would reenact the Brady law and call for more intense background checks including for gun shows.
6. 

   ferritt123 said, about 1 year ago

   No. You should try to harness the energy of a 2 or 3 yr. old.
7. 

   YokohamaMama said, about 1 year ago

   From what I can see – and I have lived in many countries where people don’t own guns – when people are stripped of their guns, they stop shooting each other. And anyway, no-one wants to strip you of all your guns, just battlefield weapons.
8. 

   sandflea said, about 1 year ago

   @treesareus

   Paranoid?
9. 

   Redkaycei Repoc said, about 1 year ago

   @treesareus

   Like England? or Sweden?… Somehow I fail to see your point….
10. 

    chireef said, about 1 year ago

    we have restrictions on the first amendment (freedom of speech, no shouting fire in a crowed theater) why not be equally sensible when it comes to the second?
11. 

    Daeder said, about 1 year ago

    If we can’t settle the gun debate, might as well solve the energy crisis.
12. 

    YokohamaMama said, about 1 year ago

    My use of “battlefield weapons” was a trifle imprecise, but any weapon that can shoot dozens (again imprecise as I have never lived in a country that allows civillians to own guns except for hunting) of bullets without reloading is totally unnecessary for personal self defence – except perhaps for a Self Defence Force, which I am guessing is what Obama wanted them for. I meant semi automatic weapons, which, in my opinion (not bias) only belong on a battlefield/war zone, if anywhere.
13. 

    flake-67121 said, about 1 year ago

    @Justice22

    you commies think you get to decide what we really mean no matter what we say. well, we don’t need to be psychic to understand that every inch you get gets you closer to your real goals. Otherwise why would you care so strongly about banning cosmetic features? Every gun on that list is exactly like dozens or hundreds of others in every way that matters, except for looks. So why is that so important to you? Because you need to do SOMETHING. It makes it easier NEXT TIME to do something MORE, of course.
14. 

    flake-67121 said, about 1 year ago

    @YokohamaMama

    battlefield weapons? You know what those are? No, you don’t, or you wouldn’t make such a stupid statement.
15. 

    Seeker149 said, about 1 year ago

    Wow, the comments above make an even stronger case for the scientists in the comic.
16. Load the rest of the comments (2).