Mike Lester by Mike Lester

Mike Lester

Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. PianoGuy24

    PianoGuy24 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Obamacare….one big blunder after another.

  2. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, over 1 year ago


    “till we go bankrupt.”

    ‘There are smoke signals from groups all around us, and as I read them, they mean we’re in big trouble, Tonto.‘

    ’What you mean “we”, paleface?’

  3. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    But under Obamacare you can get Laid! That is what they are advertising in Colorado.

  4. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 1 year ago

    Yep, and it hits full steam right before next year’s elections….

  5. DGF999

    DGF999 said, over 1 year ago

    I may be wrong, but if one lost their insurance due to Obamacare, couldn’t they sue the government?

  6. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    But it will not be Obama’s fault, in his world he said it and it is so. You can now keep it* for a year and if you can not it is not Obama’s fault. He has blamed the State and those evil insurance companies for not doing as he has proclaimed.

  7. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    So, complain and do nothing. Or work on a fix. Survey says: Complain and Do Nothing. Audience applause. Host kisses female contestant. Promise of a home version of Our Game. Credits.

  8. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    Seriously? That’s your criteria here? He’s better than Bush?

    Wow. Way to reach for the stars there.

  9. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 1 year ago


    He is a master at regurgitating liberal talking points. And blaming Bush is basic.

  10. artistdavid

    artistdavid said, over 1 year ago


    Obamacare, one big lie after another! And a big percent of Libs still ignore that Obama and the Clintons are liars.

  11. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    I’m one of those who looks at both sides and sees good and bad. I’m also one of those who believes the person we vote into office should be more than ‘well he’s better than the last looser’. Obama has been an awful president. The fact that Bush may have been a worse one means nothing.

    The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Obama just drove us a little closer.

  12. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    Your question seems to assume that Big Business can’t field a candidate who can win popular election. Also, and I apologize if I am incorrect in my assumptions, I am inferring that you think Obama does not have the backing of the ‘1%’. That’s not true. He received quite a bit in financial support from Wall Street. Lastly, you seem to be expanding upon the notion that the ‘1%’ are somehow to blame or are some heartless machine. I don’t buy into that mythos, or at least not all of it. Let’s assume that the 1% are spending money to buy political power and influence (and I don’t doubt that there is some of this going on). How does that excuse any politician who accepts their funds? Obama took their funds. How is he different? And yes, the same can be said of politicians on both sides of the aisle.

  13. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    I apologize for the assumption. Given the choice, I would prefer president of the people. ALL of the people. No one social group, rich or poor, should be the focus of a government.

    At this point though, I would settle for a president who took responsibility for his actions. That’s something we have not had in a long, long time.

  14. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    Not easily placated. Just desperate.

    Since part of your post was cut off, I’ll refrain from answering the rest. Please repost and I’ll be happy to reply. Thanks.

  15. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    They aren’t my only criteria. My comments above were meant to be sarcastic.

    Also, let me be clear on something. I’m not conservative, though I suppose I have more sympathies with them than the left. A socialist solution to a problem is not necessarily the worst one. Nor is it necessarily the best one.

    One thing that baffles me is why everyone these days acts like the 1% having power is so shocking. Pretty much throughout history the rich have held power. And quite often, under their rule, things are awful for the non-rich in those situations. However, there isn’t a lot of evidence of things being any better when the poor hold power: Stalin. The Khmer Rouge. The French Revolution… none of these are what I would consider high points in human history.

    I don’t think a single man or woman could reverse the situation you describe. The only way to reverse a trend like the one you describe is with a true democracy. One person, one vote. That also assumes that the great majority of the population has a basic level of education and willingness to seek after facts. As long as I’m dreaming I might as well throw in a media that stays apolitical and focuses on reporting only information and not opinion.

    I digress. To answer your question, I think the reversal of the situation you describe needs to be handled by Congress/Senate. Not the president. Should the president just sit around and play with his toy boats? Absolutely not. But the solution should not be up to him.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (4).