Two-time Pulitzer Prize winner Michael Ramirez combines an encyclopedic knowledge of the news with a captivating drawing style to create consistently outstanding editorial cartoons.
"Editorial cartoons should be smart and substantive, provocative and informative. They should stir passions and deep emotions. Editorial cartoons should be the catalyst for thought, and frankly speaking, if you can make politicians think, that is an accomplishment in itself."
© Michael Ramirez - All Rights Reserved.
Ted Rall by Ted Rall
Marshall Ramsey by Marshall Ramsey
Comments (50) (Please sign in to comment)
dtroutma
said, about 1 year ago
Romney FIRED people, collapsed businesses by raiding their accumulated funds and collateral, then sold them off. Of all the corporations listed for “the twit”, there isn’t a single one actually “built” or “improved” by Bain. There isn’t ANY evidence, that Mitt actually took personal control of a single “growth”. Well unless the cancer to destroy businesses.
hanmari said, about 1 year ago
Wow, dtroutma, you are completely duped by the Obama propaganda machine. If you love Obama so much, go ahead and vote for him. The rest of us recognize who the real twit is and look forward to replacing him with Romney. Go troll the chat boards somewhere else, because you’re not converting anybody to follow Obama here.
ninety_nine_percent said, about 1 year ago
Romney = GW Bush
(same lobbyists, same wealthy donors, same game plan)
NebulousRikulau
said, about 1 year ago
Funny how 3 months ago the GOP was all,
“ANYBODY but Mitt.”
And now you think of him as the second coming of Richard Nixon.
And what about that Socialist Medical Program that Mitt forced through in Massachusetts? The US doesn’t need anything like THAT, does it?
lonecat said, about 1 year ago
@NebulousRikulau
The second coming of Richard Nixon!!!! Now that’s scary.
davedelk said, about 1 year ago
Mitt was a vulture capitalist, specializing in stripping off revenue streams and downsizing companies, worked for Bain Capital and not Bain, which was responsible for helping those companies mentioned. Mitt taking credit for those companies is as disingenuous as him taking credit for the auto bailout.
Heavy B said, about 1 year ago
Some things missing from romney.
-Destroyed Jobs
-Made millions, regardless of whether a company suceeded or not.
-Cost people their pensions and health insurance
-47th in job creation as gov of masachusetts
-Creates wealth (for himself)
-Oil Subsidies
-Would increase the debt by 8.8 trillion
-“Severely CONservative”
-“More Liberal than Ted Kennedy”
-Tried to take credit for a bailout he was against (has he not heard of the internet?)
-Yet to be vetted
As for Obama:
-Created 3.3 million jobs
-Saved millions of jobs with the auto bailout
-Actually got Osama Bin Laden
-Ended War in Iraq
-Created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
And I feel the need to bring this up whenever someone brings up solyndra. Oil subsidies rank in the BILLIONS. Not even close to what solyndra got.
onguard said, about 1 year ago
Caution!!!!! Dem Libs above, are creating one of their renowned Illusions, void of facts and reality.
jack75287 said, about 1 year ago
Ok all if the labor participation is at a low point how can unemployment be going down.
Machado
said, about 1 year ago
Like I said before, Ramirez is on a roll!
Just check out the usual suspects rants’ here,LOL
dtroutma
said, about 1 year ago
Mitt’s "war chest’ of advisors on “foreign affairs”, are the same from “W” who got us INTO Afghanistan and Iraq, and want desperately to start a war with Iran. While economics WILL play a huge role in the coming century, avoiding WARS will be a key, as well as reducing the ludicrous amount we spend on “defense”.
Mitt = “W” = still more war, for profit, of a few, while others die. THAT is what should concern folks.
wbr said, about 1 year ago
one plus for mitt he took bankrupt or near bankrupt co an was successful in turning them around 78% time
Eryx
said, about 1 year ago
Neither of you can argue from strength, so you resort to ad hominem attacks. Your party is morally and ethically bankrupt. You offer nothing other than “Anyone but Obama”. You will still be enraged whether Romney loses or wins in a landslide. Because if he wins, he will have to govern, and you don’t like that, either. And you won’t like what his policies will do to the economy. So you will then be left with the same inchoate rage.
Bruce4671 said, about 1 year ago
@NebulousRikulau
hahahaha, you are so funny. There were a lot of candidates running around trying to get our attention. The MEDIA is the one that kept throwing out the “anyone but mitt” theme. We waited to see who would make the best case and not get totally destroyed by the machine. There he is, Romney. Yeah, we are all going to get behind him now. Sort of like last years democratic primary. Remember? It was tough for a while, like when Hillary first brought up the birth certificate thing.
zoidknight said, about 1 year ago
@dtroutma
Actually he did none of those. That took place 2 years AFTER someone else bought out the company.