Matt Wuerker by Matt Wuerker

Matt Wuerker

Recommended

Comments (28) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. mickey1339

    mickey1339 said, 4 months ago

    Of course this story is just a little bit (actually a lot) one sided in lambasting the Rep’s. They deserve it, but the article linked shows that a boatload of money, $141,000, was given to the Obama campaign and Amgen lobbyists were in the White House several times last year. One of their principal lobbyists is “Tony Podesta, whose fast-growing lobbying firm has unusually close ties to the White House.”


    So once more we get a fine example of American politics where both congress and the president are on the dole from K Street lobbyists.


    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/us/medicare-pricing-delay-is-political-win-for-amgen-drug-maker.html?pagewanted=all&r=0


    http://www.amgen.com/about/corporate_governance_political

    contributions.html

  2. rightisright

    rightisright said, 4 months ago

    When government is little more than a glorified mafia, expect businesses of all sizes to pay protection money. Amgen products do more for people than these buffoons ever will.

  3. masterskrain

    masterskrain said, 4 months ago

    America, home of the BEST politicians money can buy, where an “Honest Politician” is described as “One who once he is bought, STAYS bought!”

  4. MortyForTyrant

    MortyForTyrant said, 4 months ago

    Nitpick: currently there is no $1000 bill.

  5. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, 4 months ago

    The fix for this sort of thing is so easy! Just remove all private money from the political process, and make it an act of treason to accept a single dollar for anything related to one’s political duties.
    Well, easy in theory, anyway… the cash addicts in the halls of power aren’t going to vote to shut down their supply, after all.

  6. firefighter_raven

    firefighter_raven said, 4 months ago

    Needs to be like nascar where the congressmen have their sponsors logo’s on their suits.

  7. Nos Nevets

    Nos Nevets said, 4 months ago

    term limits

  8. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, 4 months ago

    @HOWGOZIT

    For once at least I have to agree with you! If you really want to be a successful thief, “Never steal anything small!”

    Or become a lawyer, or even better, a politician!!

  9. Rickapolis

    Rickapolis said, 4 months ago

    ‘One lawyer with his briefcase can steal more than a hundred men with guns’.- Vito Corleone

  10. mickey1339

    mickey1339 said, 4 months ago

    @The Wolf In Your Midst

    “The fix for this sort of thing is so easy! Just remove all private money from the political process, and make it an act of treason to accept a single dollar for anything related to one’s political duties.”


    It would be more than a theory when you extend the penalty to lobbyists giving the money and then prosecuted both sides of the transaction. Wouldn’t that be a novel change, politicians that hold the interests of the people above their own gain…

  11. dtroutma

    dtroutma said, 4 months ago

    If elected officials had the same legally defined limits on their “lobbying” and punishments, as civil servants, the problem would basically go away. Shut down 85% of K street operations, and you’d still have 300 times the number of lobbyists pre-Reagan era. It was deregulation in this area as well, that led to the decline in government ethics, as “conservatism” overwhelmed “public service” as a mantra.

  12. braindead08

    braindead08 said, 4 months ago

    @The Wolf In Your Midst

    A more doable fix would be to make it illegal for a legislator or staffer to ever become a lobbyist. Ok, maybe not a complete fix, but a good start.
    -
    an idea from Jack Abramoff, of all people. One of the things Ambramoff did was to offer staffers lucrative positions for ‘just a little tweaking’ of legislation.

  13. ARodney

    ARodney said, 4 months ago

    How come any corporation can give $1000 to a congressman or president, but I can’t bribe a judge before he sentences me? It can’t be “money is speech,” or there woudn’t be a distinction.

  14. ruff

    ruff said, 4 months ago

    @Nos Nevets

    That will just increase the total number. Every 2 or 4 or 6 years a new taker.

  15. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 4 months ago

    @HOWGOZIT

    I’m glad you see that now. Very good. We may yet agree.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (13).