Comments (13) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   nieko said, 12 months ago

   Politician…..
2. 

   1opinion said, 12 months ago

   Always thought there was something wrong about Edwards. His wife was being treated for cancer but it was more important to him to run for office than put his efforts into getting his wife cured and cared for. Along the line of Newt wanting to discuss divorce terms while his first wife was in a hospital bed recovering from cancer surgery.
3. 

   indieme said, 12 months ago

   Where is the jury for John Ensign’s trial?
4. 

   win said, 12 months ago

   John Edwards? Bill Clinton? Gary Hart? John Kennedy? Ted Kennedy? Dick Nixon? Spiro Agnew? Warren G. Harding? James Buchanan? Millard Fillmore? Thomas Jefferson?C’MON!!! get over it and pay attention to the lyin’ weasels runnin’ the current CF…oh, I guess we’re DOA…locked-out, or down, BUT not for the count!
   I still vote my local elections and hope D.C. expires on its own (de) merits…Congress: KMA and wear kevlar
5. 

   Radish said, 12 months ago

   Irrelevant pretty boy gets caught in his own machinations.
6. 

   Tue Elung-Jensen said, 12 months ago

   I prefer wanker myself :)
7. 

   dtroutma said, 12 months ago

   There IS a difference between people who even admit they’re “creepy” when it comes to “morality”, but that doesn’t show up in law. Well it does in religious law, like Leviticus that the “religious right” want, but that would be the same as “Sharia”- oops!!

   
   Most of the world doesn’t care what people do in their bedrooms. They don’t want their nations punishing people for those behaviors. So, why is it the “Don’t tread on me” people, here, who DO??
8. 

   mikefive said, 12 months ago

   I don’t think it’s the bedroom that’s on trial. I think it’s the cash box.
9. 

   TJDestry said, 12 months ago

   Well, technically, if he’d been a wanker, none of it would have happened …
10. 

    Bruce4671 said, 12 months ago

    @dtroutma

    Trout, the man took money that was supposed to be used for the campaign to hide his extra marital relationship. OK, he can have all the extra women he can pay for. That’s the rub. All HE can pay for not pay for with constituents money contributed for a specific purpose.
    
    But he is a politician and does not see the difference. He thinks your money is his money. Just like all the rest of them in DC.
11. 

    Eryx said, 12 months ago

    @Bruce4671

    Twelve of his fellow citizens did not agree with you.
12. 

    pirate227 said, 12 months ago

    Scandalous? Yes. Illegal? Doesn’t appear so.
    Gotta love campaign finance laws…
13. 

    saywhatwhat said, 12 months ago

    @TJDestry

    Yes, and the world would probably be a better place if we had more of those.
14. Refresh Comments.