It will add up to billions when people without insurance go into deep debt for cancer treatment, yes. Thanks for asking, and for caring.
Well, they liked him enough to give him real landslides — not imaginary Trump landslides — and to give the next Democratic candidate a majority of their votes, so, yes, he’s surrounded by people who like him.
An informed opinion would simply confuse his fans.
I guess spending the last eight years on THIS planet was a mistake — gotta readjust to a world run by people who were living in a different reality.
Turncoats and traitors will love this. Sell it to Pravda.
So ISIS is bad? Really? That’s your insight for this week?
Yeah, to heck with international law! The Geneva Convention is for sissies, with all those rules against torture and taking over other countries’ land. Besides, Henry knows that all Muslims are terrorists because, gosh, those are the ones he reads about at Briebart and so that’s all of them.
I’m used to laziness from Dana, but this is a very energetic form of not getting the point — an off-hand analysis of the election becomes “trashing” someone, non-violent drug offenders become “a bunch of felons” and finally allowing the UN to try to keep world peace becomes “betraying an ally.” So I guess Dana’s wishes for 2017 are that we stop talking about ways to improve, that we lock people up for smoking dope and that we stand in the way of international law so that more people can be pointlessly killed in Mideaster Wars.
And that’s how we make America great again!
Wait — is Ted saying you can’t nominate people if their politics are not in line with the opposition? WTF, Ted??? Going after the obvious conflict of interest is the only intelligent way to oppose him. You really don’t understand how politics work, do you?
Henry has set a bar for ignorance that makes it hard for him to outdo himself, but this is a very good attempt.