Matt Davies by Matt Davies

Matt Davies

Comments (10) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, almost 2 years ago

    Misguided liberals thinking it’s the NRA. More gun laws they say. What about the 41 that were broken to commit this tragedy? If a law is so potent, why didn’t they stop this? Yet you’ll still call for new laws.

  2. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    The simple fact is, the NRA has fought all the most logical regulation proposed, like magazine size, and stricter background checks, even though their membership supports stronger checks and limits on purchases, and even gun show laxity.

  3. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    Restricting access to weapons is a bit like restricting access to free speech or the voting place or political power. In fact, they are often a package deal. Politicians should be limited in the harm they can do by limiting their power well before the law-abiding citizen is limited in theirs. Assuming that there is a divine right to rule above a natural right to bear arms should be against the Constitution, one should think. As for non-law-abiding citizens, well, what law, even the Constitution, will ever be effective?

  4. NeoconMan

    NeoconMan said, almost 2 years ago

    @onguard

    ^ Yow, I gotta get me a Bushmaster. Proven accuracy and reliability.

  5. ninety_nine_percent

    ninety_nine_percent said, almost 2 years ago

    Matt, I am with you, our politicians are not just hiding, but actively supporting irresponsible gun laws.

  6. echoraven

    echoraven said, almost 2 years ago

    The day the NRA dies, a new Hitler will arise.

  7. Gresch

    Gresch GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    Was iit really a gun from Fast & Furious?

  8. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    @echoraven

    Will he be running the new NRA?

  9. STLDan

    STLDan said, almost 2 years ago

    There is no need for assult weapons and high capacity clips in our society. ALL the reasons any of you give to have them are plain rediculous. “We need them to protect ourselves from a tyranical goverment” is my favorite. Yes yes take your Bushmaster and go stop that tank, the US military has a little more punch to thier weapons and when was the last time you heard of a group of citizens taking on the army because the goverment was oppressing them? GIVE ME A BREAK you yahoos!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  10. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    @Dredpiraterobt$

    Irresponsible use of speech is punishable, and irresponsible use of firearms must also be punishable. Nobody prevents you from possessing whatever vocabulary you desire, though using it without discretion may lead to unhappiness. When you argue, prepare to sit in the corner into which you have painted yourself until it dries. Practical realities are not arguable. Your divine right to control others does not supercede their right to exercise free will. You may argue that it does, but then why should you be allowed to if that is your actual opinion?

  11. Refresh Comments.