Matt Bors by Matt Bors

Matt Bors

Comments (22) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 3 years ago

    And I bought a beer. So what?

  2. Liam Burns

    Liam Burns GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Thanks libtards for all your useless gun laws. This can go both ways. If you’re not careful Mr Radish, I’ll go ALL CAPS, then you’ll really be sorry.

  3. NebulousRikulau

    NebulousRikulau GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    As I’ve always said,
    Guns don’t kill people, bullets kill people.
    There have apparently been some attempts to make ammo through 3D printing, but the problem is still the propellant.
    You still need to buy gunpowder, THAT can still be controlled.

  4. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    The application of science and technology should be limited to whatever an oppressive government says is acceptable. All technologies not approved by the Ministry of Silly Walks must therefore be suppressed and made illegal. Still, there is no reason to believe that tyrannical madness on a grand scale will be better then the possibility of tyrannical madness on an individual scale, just more organized and better able to clean up after itself.

  5. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, over 3 years ago

    The difference is prices, but yes him not being properly checked would be an issue.

  6. SavannahJim

    SavannahJim GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Right on ConserveGov – cause nothing goes together like alcohol and automatic weapons. Hell, why do you think they call it the ATF in the first place?

  7. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 3 years ago

    @Liam Burns

    “Thanks libtards for all your useless gun laws.”

    Are these the laws that conservatives constantly complain are not being enforced? And what are the conservatives doing to ensure that they will be enforced in the future, so that no other laws need be passed?

    Or can we just be honest and say that no gun laws of any kind are satisfactory?

    Inquiring minds want to know.

  8. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 3 years ago

    @NebulousRikulau

    “As I’ve always said,
    Guns don’t kill people, bullets kill people.”

    True, as far as it goes. I’d like you to introduce me to someone who has guns and no bullets. Or someone who doesn’t find the need to squeeze the trigger every now and then.

    If people have guns, they will shoot things. If they have dynamite, they will blow things up. That is our nature. Bickering based on semantics is futile.

  9. Darren Blair

    Darren Blair said, over 3 years ago

    As a conservative who supports the Second Amendment?
    []
    The only guns I’d be making would be ones for my G. I. Joe collection.
    []
    I’d rather not trust anyone’s life to something that could fail on the first attempt at firing.

  10. AgentSmith101

    AgentSmith101 said, over 3 years ago

    @Radish
    Think of what could happen if that soldier and a couple other people could conceal carry? Gasp You mean you can stop a murder with those things without firing them?
    Yes we can.

  11. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    A note on the British event: an UNARMED WOMAN approached the killers and talked them down. Police then arrived and shot both men, wounding, but not killing them.


    An overall strange event, but they said their grievance was with the soldier having served in Afghanistan and killing people. Think what these guys might have done with an AR 15 or even a Glock had their “grievance” been of less specific nature, like our school shooters, Laughner, or the dude in Aurora making movie theaters mass murder sites. Yep, right, only nutso Muslims kill people.

  12. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    @dtroutma

    “Think what these guys might have done with an AR 15 or even a Glock had their “grievance” been of less specific nature”
    Or even if they had been political leaders who had been able to obtain such power as to be able to command life and death of those in their power. Here is a way to kill millions by saving a few hundred, maybe thousands, and a guarantee that such power can never fall into the wrong hands if we award that power to the power hungry. One’s best arguments weigh most heavily against one’s own beliefs. We just never take the time to complete the thought, since we only need one side of it to put up a convincing façade.

  13. Annoyed at idiots

    Annoyed at idiots said, over 3 years ago

    It takes 3 to 5 days to get one, so not accurate or really funny.

  14. Lektio

    Lektio said, over 3 years ago

    These plastic guns are less accurate than a flintlock pistol, and have extremely low durability (That is, they’re single-shot weapons that have a tendency to blow up in your hand.) They only fire a single .22 calibre shot, which, unless you’re a crazy good shot, isn’t stopping anyone. Did I mention they’re less accurate than a flintlock?
    Furthermore, the high-end printer that can make high enough quality plastic will run you about fifty thou. If you buy a lower end printer, the gun is guaranteed to come apart in your hand.
    Also, you have to stick a big piece of metal in the handle (for the metal detectors), or it’s illegal. And as long as you’re going illegal, people are just gonna get black market arms, which are cheaper than a nice 3D printer anyhow.

  15. Rx71Wm29

    Rx71Wm29 GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Yeah, all we need now is to 3-D print some ammo! But, plastic ammo? Don’t know how well that will work. Can “hunting” and “target shooting” but anywhere near as much fun using plastic guns AND ammo? Of course, all those accused of mass killings, using plastic gun/ammo, in future can always plead “Temporary Insanity” at their trials.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (7).