Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized
Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you
want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade
to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
One may have moral feelings against anything and be entirely correct, though it may not be universally applicable, except maybe for being morally opposed to imposed morality.
Scalia was more then likely in the bar with his “manservant”, Thomas. Clarence looks so cute in his collar and leash… I could mention that Bors has colored the Rainbow Flag upside down, but I believe I will pass…
It’s interesting to see those wanting to redefine morality defining themselves as the ones’ that are moral.
Equally interesting is that “conservatives” exempted the parts of the Bible that disallows what they approve of, yet the prohibition against the one thing they find icky still applies.
I’m morally opposed to hypocrisy, and using select excerpts of one’s professed religion to browbeat people you don’t like while ignoring other parts that proscribe doing the things you want to do.
“Equally interesting is that “conservatives” exempted the parts of the Bible….” ♦ You made me try to think of a religion that doesn’t do that. Couldn’t think of one. ♦ I wasn’t really thinking of religion when I made my comment but was thinking more generally of how a person or group of people consider their own morality compared to the morality of the society to which they belong. It just seems that if the mores of a society are in conflict with the desires of an individual or group, then said individual or group wants and tries to convince society that their desires are moral. “Desires” being the operant word here.
Sam Donaldson would frequently refer to Reagan’s mental state in lectures during that administration, but the corporate media would never let him say it on the air.
“Cannot” or “Do Not”? “Feelings” or “Rationale” . I wasn’t aware that this nation legislated what we may and may not have “Fellings” about. There is certainly a national ethos that scorns those that feel opposite to the zeitgeist. For example, if you are a proponent of slave labor, then normalized response to you is “Sit down and shut up!” . A little disturbing to see a SCOTUS Justice have such trouble with syntax and expressing a single convoluted thought. . I know I do too, but I’m nobody as a result of it.
From recession woes to social networking, Matt Bors’ cartoons dissect and satirize the ways of the world to make readers think and laugh about the real issues affecting them.
Chip Bok by Chip Bok
Steve Breen by Steve Breen
Comments (29) (Please sign in to comment)
BrassOrchid
said, 5 months ago
One may have moral feelings against anything and be entirely correct, though it may not be universally applicable, except maybe for being morally opposed to imposed morality.
Radish
said, 5 months ago
The moral majority is neither.
masterskrain said, 5 months ago
Scalia was more then likely in the bar with his “manservant”, Thomas.
Clarence looks so cute in his collar and leash…
I could mention that Bors has colored the Rainbow Flag upside down, but I believe I will pass…
masterskrain said, 5 months ago
@Radish
The “Moral Majority” has NEVER been either…
mikefive said, 5 months ago
It’s interesting to see those wanting to redefine morality defining themselves as the ones’ that are moral.
motivemagus said, 5 months ago
Equating murder with homosexuality tells you all you need to about Scalia’s flawed morality…
motivemagus said, 5 months ago
…Given that, by the same logic, you can say you cannot have moral feelings against ANYTHING…
Jase99 said, 5 months ago
@mikefive
It’s interesting to see those wanting to redefine morality defining themselves as the ones’ that are moral.
Equally interesting is that “conservatives” exempted the parts of the Bible that disallows what they approve of, yet the prohibition against the one thing they find icky still applies.
ghostkeeper said, 5 months ago
Out of curiousity, when and if Scalia devellops senile dementia, will anybody know? Or care?
cjr53 said, 5 months ago
@ghostkeeper
We’ll care. But, fat lot of good it will do us, just like uncle ronnie raygun who couldn’t remember anything.
The Wolf In Your Midst said, 5 months ago
I’m morally opposed to hypocrisy, and using select excerpts of one’s professed religion to browbeat people you don’t like while ignoring other parts that proscribe doing the things you want to do.
masterskrain said, 5 months ago
@ghostkeeper
That was the same question a LOT of us had about Reagan…
mikefive said, 5 months ago
@Jase99
“Equally interesting is that “conservatives” exempted the parts of the Bible….”
♦
You made me try to think of a religion that doesn’t do that. Couldn’t think of one.
♦
I wasn’t really thinking of religion when I made my comment but was thinking more generally of how a person or group of people consider their own morality compared to the morality of the society to which they belong. It just seems that if the mores of a society are in conflict with the desires of an individual or group, then said individual or group wants and tries to convince society that their desires are moral. “Desires” being the operant word here.
hippogriff said, 5 months ago
Sam Donaldson would frequently refer to Reagan’s mental state in lectures during that administration, but the corporate media would never let him say it on the air.
Dredpiraterobt$ said, 5 months ago
“Cannot” or “Do Not”? “Feelings” or “Rationale”
.
I wasn’t aware that this nation legislated what we may and may not have “Fellings” about. There is certainly a national ethos that scorns those that feel opposite to the zeitgeist. For example, if you are a proponent of slave labor, then normalized response to you is “Sit down and shut up!”
.
A little disturbing to see a SCOTUS Justice have such trouble with syntax and expressing a single convoluted thought.
.
I know I do too, but I’m nobody as a result of it.