Lalo Alcaraz by Lalo Alcaraz

Lalo Alcaraz

Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. mskemple

    mskemple said, over 1 year ago

    That’s racist as it gets – OBTW , where’s the tea and skittles?

  2. STLDan

    STLDan said, over 1 year ago


    Do you even know what the word racist mean? Apparently not, dont know why I asked…

  3. robert  culver

    robert culver GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    they have just about as much control as the people

  4. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 1 year ago


    And what is your point Doc? He who has the gold rules. It’s been that way since we used cowrie shells for barter.

    Or is that supposed to be some big secret?

  5. mdavis4183

    mdavis4183 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Lalo Alacaraz evidently hates Jenifer Lopez. She’s oner of the 1%.

  6. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Ya know, if you make just 34,000 here in the good old USA, you my friend are in the 1% of the world. So how does that make you feel Lalo to be holding the gun.
    Speaking of money, Don’t you find the loony liberal hypocrisy a little thick. the last election Obama ran on the wealth envy class warfare stick. Mitt mean and rich and blah blah blah. Yet Mitt made his own money in the private sector bailing out companies and saving jobs. Obama on the other hand has never held a private sector job that amounted to anything and yet has made a few million. Now take a look at Clinton’s “Charities” and how he and she live the life of luxury with the foundation’s money. In a scandal that makes Whitewater look like pocket change.

  7. churchillwasright

    churchillwasright said, over 1 year ago

    Hey Alcarez! Aren’t you late for an Occupy Wall Street Rally somewhere?? oh, wait, there aren’t any…

  8. pirate227

    pirate227 said, over 1 year ago

    It makes me smile seeing these misguided 99%’ers defending the 1%. Now go and graze on that grass you good little sheeple.

  9. DLee4144

    DLee4144 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    As long as most people have enough food, a house that keeps them reasonably comfortable and a car that runs, we aren’t going to have any kind of a revolution, because they have lives that occupy their time.
    However, the middle class is shrinking, a larger and larger percentage of the money is going to the 1%ers, and if that continues, there will be a point where there aren’t enough of them to kill all of us before we kill them.

  10. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 1 year ago

    LOL you’d be surprised at just what we’uns know.

    Have ya caught a 5 foot gator with your hands lately? Not only is it fun…they are tasty … well .. if you have a permit that is.

    yep…..I can run a trot line…skin a buck too…LOL

  11. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 1 year ago


    fortunately, I was indeed raised in the “back woods” and taught the value of hard work and budget management as opposed to reliance on government largesse….. as you were IF your past statements of being “born and raised” in West (by god) Virginia are true (which I accept on face value).

    But really Doc, in what endeavor exactly does the one with NO FUNDS control the action?

  12. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 1 year ago


    How naive is THAT comment.

    I suppose George, Ben, John and the boys were the paupers in the colonies LOL

  13. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 1 year ago


    So was the American one (yes I know humans are a contentious lot so revolt is common) bottom up that is from the perspective of the King. As I “believe” that to be the case in every one you cite. The “leaders” of the revolt are NOT paupers. However, those that do the actual dying usually are.

    Take the French one, who were the leaders?
    One was Georges Jacques Danton the son of Jacques Danton, an attorney himself and a man of power and influence and wealth. Then there was an obscure general that helped remember him? I’m sure HE was just a poor man.

    It’s perspective Doc and just as a side note the French revolt was because of the huge DEBT the the King and his predecessor Kings ran up… but that is off the subject.

    And by definition – well mine anyway – a revolution is always bottom up in terms of who is in charge . It’s money against money though with us po’boys doing all the fightin’ and dyin’…

  14. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, over 1 year ago

    @"DrCanuck said, 3 days ago


    ^ Yup, the only revolution in the world’s history was American.

    (good grief. THAT’S naive. And downright ignorant.)France, 1789. Russia, 1917. Argentina, 1945. Cuba, 1959. Czechoslovakia, 1968…..

    All bottom up.

    America never had a revolution. the same people who were, in fact, in power before the ‘revolution’, were the same people who were in power after the ‘revolution’. Hence, no revolution.

  15. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, over 1 year ago

    ^the british may have THOUGHT they were in charge, but they were in fact NOT. they were essentially an occupying force. the ‘founding fathers’ were wealthy, powerful and in control, before and after the so-called revolution.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (4).