Joe Heller by Joe Heller

Joe Heller

Recommended

Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. AlnicoV

    AlnicoV said, 6 months ago

    Joe Heller seems to have forgotten the Bundesnachrichtendienst or BND who doubtlessly are also plugged in now as they have been for decades.

  2. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, 6 months ago

    The Chinese says, ‘Her angry.’


    Heller didn’t know the difference between ‘she’ and ‘her’.

  3. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    This is a LOT truer then most people will want to admit!
    Anyone remember the line from “Don’t Drink The Water?
    ‘We spy on you, you spy on us, and everyone knows it…’”
    And that was written in the 60s!

  4. Enoki

    Enoki said, 6 months ago

    But, we’re the only one with a leader that will cave and stop doing it…

  5. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    @Debt Free

    No one ever claimed spying did not occur before your boy blunder signed the most unconstitutional, intrusive and abusive piece of legislation ever. It is you and your ilk who try to claim nothing bad happened in this country between January 20, 2001 and January 20, 2009.
    The fact that you don’t know this or won’t acknowledge this fact, SHOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. Overtaxed

    Overtaxed GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    Foreign affairs is one place where there is no hope for Obama ever being able to do anything except dig an even bigger hole with nobody to bail him out. Foreigners have no loser socialist Obamavoters for His Losership to fall back on for support. There is only one way out. Abdicate the throne.

  7. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    @Overtaxed

    You seem awfully desperate to have Joe Biden as President.

  8. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, 6 months ago

    @TheTrustedMechanic

    “No one ever claimed spying did not occur before your boy blunder signed the most unconstitutional, intrusive and abusive piece of legislation ever.”

    Yep, it was a bad law. Lots of conservatives said so. Some Dems voted for it, and have voted for expansions. Including Obama.

    Yep, your boy kept doing it, and expanded it as president. When do you plan to rant about him?

    You can’t get the Kool-Aid out of your system as long as you’re drinking it.

  9. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    Well, since the NSA has been listening in on Merkel’’s calls since 2002, AND it answers to the Department of Defense, I guess we need to look and see who was the Secretary of Defense in 2002…Gee, it was Rumsfeld! What a surprise!

  10. spyderred

    spyderred GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    It’s true that the NSA started their spying-on-everyone empire under Shrub, but it is also true that members of Congress and the administration have had ample time to investigate and rein the NSA in and have … actually, not a thing. I guess they all assume that it’s okay if the NSA is not spying on them. How do they know that the NSA isn’t spying on them? The NSA told them so.

  11. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 6 months ago

    Spying on a fence post or an empty head (Congress) would be a waste of time…
    And what good is all this so-called spying if all of us know about it ????

  12. pirate227

    pirate227 said, 6 months ago

    Word…

  13. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, 6 months ago

    Everyone knows that if there is another act of terror, there will be a sizable number of people who will blame those in charge because they didn’t prevent it. As a result, the spying program will never reduce, because even with the most intensive snooping, we will not be able to predict everything.

    Now that the program is in place, all it can do is grow until we as a society decide that our freedom (which “they hate”, which is why we went to fight them over there, so we don’t have to fight them over here, and which the government has determined must be given up to ensure it continues) is more important than the government’s right to know. Given the “I don’t do anything wrong, so I don’t care” percentage of the population, I don’t see us being able to stop it.

    Regardless, there is so much information now stored, and planned to be stored, we will not be able to process the sheer volume. After the next disaster, we’ll be able to say: “We could have known about that.” And perpetuating this sham will continue to cost untold billions.

  14. CARAPORAM

    CARAPORAM said, 6 months ago

    @Enoki

    Are we really stopping?

  15. lonecat

    lonecat said, 6 months ago

    @Michael wme

    That’s interesting. That would mean that Chinese is an ergative-absolutive language, in which the experiencer of an intransitive verb is in the same case as the patient of a transitive verb. About 30% of known languages have ergative-absolutive features. English (and most European languages, except Basque) are nominative-accusative languages, in which the experiencer of an intransitive verb is in the same case as the agent of a transitive verb. (But the old “methinks” is an ergative construction.)

  16. Load the rest of the comments (1).