Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin

Comments (9) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 2 years ago

    A judge in New Mexico’s Supreme Court voted in favor of a homosexual couple that had sued a wedding photographer for refusing to photograph a same sex union on religious grounds. An interesting read on this court case (and the subject at hand) can be found at:


    If you are interested in a more a more balanced look at the current situation on gay discrimination and discrimination in general, this is a very good read.

  2. Darsan54

    Darsan54 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Interesting to note, the court didn’t force the photographer to actually shoot the ceremony, rather they punished the refusal to shoot it because it was presented in a discriminatory manner.

  3. alexzabala

    alexzabala said, over 2 years ago

    Get ready folks….here it comes…MILITANT GAYS will be suing you soon. I understand it’s wrong to discriminate…but it’s also wrong to be sued because you refuse to perform a service based on your beliefs…are you ready?

  4. nate9279

    nate9279 said, over 2 years ago

    No More mindless haters with sucky senses of humor.

  5. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Interesting that someone on the right noted that “good” Muslims and “good” Christians at least agree on hating and persecuting “gays”, or well anyone else their religious beliefs dictate.

  6. pirate227

    pirate227 said, over 2 years ago

    “Money-money-money, mon-ney!”

  7. omQ R

    omQ R said, over 2 years ago

    confessed: I have changed my mind and hopefully – improved.

    Well, that leaves me almost speechless.
    Almost. I shall withdraw my criticism of one of your comments on the subject a couple of days ago.

    @ mikefive My hat off to you, sir; you’ve achieved something few on this forum ever have: actually convincing someone else to another view.

  8. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    “How about this real case of a lesbian in Canada going to the Human Rights Tribunal because a Muslim barber shop will not give her a man’s haircut.”

    You have it wrong. It had nothing to do with her being gay or her wanting a men’s haircut. It’s his religious belief that men and women should not touch members of the opposite gender unless they are a married couple. He didn’t refuse service because he believed she was sinful, but he believed it was sinful for him to touch her.

  9. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    The bakery and barber cases are different. The bakery refused service because they judged the customer as sinful. The barber wasn’t condemning his perspective customer. He was trying to avoid sinning himself. The case isn’t about him judging her or forcing his beliefs on her. If he employed a woman to cut women’s hair, would the lesbian in question still have been refused service? That would have made this case on par with the AZ bakery.

  10. Refresh Comments.