Dtroutma, when it comes down to it, I’m actually somewhat on your side on this one (how ever scary that is for either of us to admit). I wouldn’t want the process to go forward unless there was much greater certainty to the fact of no ill effects. If that can be proven, then I highly advocate for it. But until that is done I’m on the side of the fence that likes the idea, but don’t want it to go into play just yet. Or would that be “on the fence?”
Regardless, until they figure out a better and/or more certain safe means, our other oil sources and methods are more than viable and ample to provide a much greater level of in dependency.
But I’m neither sold on the proposed problems (as the environmentalists have proven themselves fanatics, wolf criers and false prophets far too many times to be trusted) nor am I sold on the safety (because these kind of companies, too, have proven themselves untrustworthy).
Dtroutma, when it comes down to it, I’m actually somewhat on your side on this one (how ever scary that is for either of us to admit). I wouldn’t want the process to go forward unless there was much greater certainty to the fact of no ill effects. If that can be proven, then I highly advocate for it. But until that is done I’m on the side of the fence that likes the idea, but don’t want it to go into play just yet. Or would that be “on the fence?”
Regardless, until they figure out a better and/or more certain safe means, our other oil sources and methods are more than viable and ample to provide a much greater level of in dependency.
But I’m neither sold on the proposed problems (as the environmentalists have proven themselves fanatics, wolf criers and false prophets far too many times to be trusted) nor am I sold on the safety (because these kind of companies, too, have proven themselves untrustworthy).