Comments (20) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Robert Landers said, about 9 hours ago

   Approval rate of President Obama = some 45%, not as good as President Obama would want I am certain.
   Approval rate for Congress = less than 10%, the worst in the entire history of even taking such pols!
   Knowing this, just who do you think the American people have ANY confidence in at this time??
2. 

   masterskrain said, about 8 hours ago

   And why is this even Obama’s fault, since the investigation was launched under the previous head of the I.R.S., who happened to be a BUSH appointee??
3. 

   rightisright said, about 6 hours ago

   low-information voters think impeachment means someone will throw fruit at obozo.
4. 

   Ms. Ima said, about 5 hours ago

   @rightisright

   O likes bananas. Throw those at him.
5. 

   MortyForTyrant said, about 5 hours ago

   But you might be a Koch for all we know…
6. 

   Adrian Snare said, about 5 hours ago

   @Robert Landers

   Our nation will be OK , IF we have confidence in ourselves…
   Who, really needs Congress ??
7. 

   Bruce4671 said, about 4 hours ago

   @masterskrain

   You keep throwing out the Blame Bush banner. I had you pegged for a more intelligent person.
   
   So, Obama – of course – knew nothing about this appointee from the Bush Era so he let him continue until he appoint Miller whom he fired one month before his retirement was official. But wait, there is more. It seems you may be wrong about this though I really don’t know who she is either. Who IS Sarah Hall Ingram?
   
   http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/irs-official-in-charge-during-tea-party-targeting-now-runs-health-care-office/
   
   Perhaps you can help me out.
8. 

   onguard said, about 3 hours ago

   @Adrian Snare

   So you don’t believe in the Constitution….. that explains a lot.
9. 

   Gore Bane said, about 3 hours ago

   @Adrian Snare

   Yes, why do you need any representation of your interests? After all, doesn’t the Government have all our interests at heart? I say we appoint Obama dictator-for-life right now and skip all the hassle.
10. 

    ronald rini said, about 3 hours ago

    I sorry compare this to nixons all nixon did was break into the democatic party office to see what they were planning. It was not any where as bad having a women sent up tp you room and taking you clothes off in front of her so you can have sex. Lying in front of the grand jury Inpeachment but stayed in office.(clinton) How about I did not know she was in the car He saved himself and left her there. Chappaquick (excuse spelling) and get a slap on the wrist a traffic violation. Sorry you libs hang on to somthing stupid as watergate. When your hero’s get a slap on the wrist. .
11. 

    Genome Project said, about 2 hours ago

    @ronald rini

    You should have stayed in school at least long enough to learn to read and write. You need to have your keyboard privileges revoked if you can’t put words together better than that.
12. 

    Genome Project said, about 2 hours ago

    @Ms. Ima

    Ima, you’ve gone a little too far with your subtle racism with that one.
13. 

    Peabody-Martini said, about 2 hours ago

    For decades the Republicans have been complaining that Richard Nixon was railroaded by the liberal media. Now they’ve totally reversed themselves in an effort to make something stick to Barack Obama.
    ’
    BTW running a burglary ring out of the White House, using the IRS against political enemies, getting caught searching for files and planting listening devices in the opposition’s headquarters, witness tampering and payoffs are what got Nixon. Low level staffers in the IRS asking probing questions of organizations wanting tax exempt status does not compare.
14. 

    ajhil said, about 2 hours ago

    @Ms. Ima

    Oh, please tell me you’re not using some right wing simian reference regarding the President! If you were, then you should have worn your clown suit today.
15. 

    ajhil said, about 2 hours ago

    @Bruce4671

    Okay, how’s this? You should understand that, according to the 1959 law defining and enabling 501c4 organizations, virtually NONE of the complainants in this so called scandal should have qualified, since the law calls for EXCLUSIVE dedication to social welfare issues. Any group with the words Party, Tea Party, or similar in their titles are prima facie candidates for auditing (and rejecting). Those IRS employees were confused and uninformed, but technically they did nothing wrong. Get it?
16. Load the rest of the comments (5).