Jeff Stahler by Jeff Stahler

Jeff Stahler

Comments (20) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. RadarRecon

    RadarRecon said, 11 months ago

    Yep. The more the bad guys have, the more the good guys need.

  2. Gresch

    Gresch GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    Why do we call them Armed Forces if we take their guns away from them?

  3. Movingsound

    Movingsound GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    Hahahaha

  4. narrowminded

    narrowminded said, 11 months ago

    Did I hear right that this naval shipyard is a “gun free Zone”?
    If so, that is beyond absurd.The idea that civilian police need to be called to stop a rampage on a naval base is simply unacceptable.

  5. narrowminded

    narrowminded said, 11 months ago

    Did I hear right that this naval shipyard is a “gun free Zone”?
    If so, that is beyond absurd.The idea that civilian police need to be called to stop a rampage on a naval base is simply unacceptable.

  6. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, 11 months ago

    @RadarRecon

    Nope. Trained cops miss in real-life situations two-thirds of the time — meaning they could hit someone else. I don’t want a bunch of amateur nutjob vigilantes putting me and my family at risk just to show off their substitute penises.

  7. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, 11 months ago

    @narrowminded

    No.

  8. echoraven

    echoraven said, 11 months ago

    Stupid toon. We need less guns so we can be more like Detroit.

  9. Joadtom

    Joadtom said, 11 months ago

    Are these cartoonists paid by the govt. to assist in brain washing? Same bull over and over. NRA promotes violence like AAA promotes drunk driving.

  10. dzw3030

    dzw3030 said, 11 months ago

    @narrowminded

    The facility is not a ship yard. Ships and weapon systems are designed there. The workers are tech and office types, not combat troops. Shipyards are full of construction workers so they don’t normally carry weapons, either.

  11. TheTruthHurts

    TheTruthHurts said, 11 months ago

    Just thinking out loud here, it’s been postulated that gun control is sought for the mentally unstable. What would be the response for a mass shooting by a individual who became mentally-ill POST obtaining weapon/s ?
    Comments please.

  12. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    @Nantucket19

    Ah, but you see, in the view of some people, trained police and guards are worthless- but if you put a gun in Joe Sixpack’s hands, he’ll become an unerring, fearless machine who will kill the bad guy instantly without any accidental harm to others.
    It’s a fantasy mindset born of watching too many spaghetti Westerns, where the good guy is always faster on the draw and the man left standing is always in the right. But these people cling to it like glue, because it gives legitimacy to the “might makes right” mindset they adore.

  13. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    @TheTruthHurts

    We re-evaluate drivers to ensure that it’s safe for them to continue to drive. We re-evaluate doctors to ensure that it’s safe for them to continue to practice. But if I said that we should re-evaluate gun owners to ensure that it’s safe for them to continue to own firearms, I’d probably be called a communist, and accused of hating America and the Constitution.

  14. r2varney

    r2varney said, 11 months ago

    @narrowminded

    Kind of an oxymoron isn’t it. It would be interesting to know how many shots were fired from the civilian police and how many bullet holes were in the “bad guy”.

  15. CAN2

    CAN2 said, 11 months ago

    @RadarRecon

    I agree!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (5).