Comments (61) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   vtcwvet said, 6 months ago

   He is waaaay past his shelf by date!
2. 

   onguard said, 6 months ago

   Susan Rice supplied all the Ammunition with her mouth that is needed to prove her lack of qualification, She may be smart but her proven poor judgement is her downfall.
3. 

   ahab said, 6 months ago

   A Rhodes Scholar,a member of the National Security Council from 1993 to 1997, and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. A brilliant woman, and onguard thinks(?) she has poor judgement . How so? She criticized John McCain’s foreign policies as reckless, during the 2008 Presidential campaign. McCain is holding a grudge, and has an axe to grind! Its as simple as that!
4. 

   walruscarver2000 said, 6 months ago

   @ahab

   Yes, but she relied on information supplied by the government intelligence when talking to the press. Anyone should know better than that. They’re the same ones that told the Shrub about the weapons in Iraq.
5. 

   onguard said, 6 months ago

   @ahab

   She Lied…………Or is guilty of not checking to know what she is saying is Good…..Bad appointee.
6. 

   onguard said, 6 months ago

   @Mr. King

   Support your Claim, Please.
7. 

   Ms. Ima said, 6 months ago

   @walruscarver2000

   Could you name one person in American politics who said there were no WMD’s before removing saddam?
8. 

   ARodney said, 6 months ago

   Nah, she didn’t lie. She said that preliminary investigations revealed [a series of talking points that preliminary investigations revealed, minus a few things that the investigators wanted to keep quiet to keep from spooking our enemies while they were still investigating], and that a full investigation would show what happened. Everything she said, as qualified in the way she qualified it, was true; and the American public did not need speculation about things that weren’t certain at that point. McCain has ulterior motives, but no actual facts to back him up. It’s a lousy thing to pick a first fight on, he should have picked something he could win using logic and facts.
9. 

   ansonia said, 6 months ago

   @Mr. King

   “Cheney ordered the CIA to find or fabricate evidence of the WMD and the connection to Al Queda”
   -
   Let’s see your source.
   ahab is here now and he says if you can’t show proof, it’s a troll post.
10. 

    ansonia said, 6 months ago

    @ahab

    That sounds a lot like what corzac calls a “deranged tirade” and “fabricated scandal.”
    -
    But, I’m sure you have a source linking her criticism of McCain to his policies to back up your “simple as that” explanation.
    Otherwise your post would fall into your definition of a troll post.
11. 

    bobwinners said, 6 months ago

    Can’t wait for him to find out just how un-powerful he has become.
12. 

    ahab said, 6 months ago

    @ansonia

    You probably need to go back to the posts regarding “proof” an trollsh behavior, ansonia. You, are quoting another poster.
13. 

    ahab said, 6 months ago

    @ansonia

    Not my definition of trollish behavior. But you seem to have an issue with me,so seek help. Trying to start a fight? Go away.
14. 

    ahab said, 6 months ago

    @ansonia

    I was just at the point of congratulating you on the tone of your posts, prior to your little insulting, lamp-posting behavior. I’m glad I did not.
15. 

    M Ster said, 6 months ago

    So if the CIA deliberately wants to hold back information to protect souces on the ground, and a political appointee cooperates, then that appointee is somehow “unqualified”? What if she didn’t cooperate and released classified information that endangered our sources? Would she then be “qualified”?
16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (46).