Jeff Danziger by Jeff Danziger

Jeff Danziger

Comments (32) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, about 4 years ago

    Yes, but she relied on information supplied by the government intelligence when talking to the press. Anyone should know better than that. They’re the same ones that told the Shrub about the weapons in Iraq.

  2. ARodney

    ARodney said, about 4 years ago

    Nah, she didn’t lie. She said that preliminary investigations revealed [a series of talking points that preliminary investigations revealed, minus a few things that the investigators wanted to keep quiet to keep from spooking our enemies while they were still investigating], and that a full investigation would show what happened. Everything she said, as qualified in the way she qualified it, was true; and the American public did not need speculation about things that weren’t certain at that point. McCain has ulterior motives, but no actual facts to back him up. It’s a lousy thing to pick a first fight on, he should have picked something he could win using logic and facts.

  3. M Ster

    M Ster said, about 4 years ago

    So if the CIA deliberately wants to hold back information to protect souces on the ground, and a political appointee cooperates, then that appointee is somehow “unqualified”? What if she didn’t cooperate and released classified information that endangered our sources? Would she then be “qualified”?

  4. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, about 4 years ago

    I’ma troll: We could start with the US head of the UN inspection team that declared the gas had been used up fighting Iran and that there was no nuclear program. Or does your childish memory go back that far?

  5. cjr53

    cjr53 said, about 4 years ago

    @M Ster

    Well, yes, but only if she is a republican.

  6. corzak

    corzak said, about 4 years ago

    "sounds a lot like what corzac calls a “deranged tirade” and “fabricated scandal.”

    I replied to you on this on Wuerker 11/22.

  7. corzak

    corzak said, about 4 years ago

    “Support your Claim, Please.”

    You really want to re-visit the “did-Bush-admin-lie-on-Iraq” debate? Really?

    Here’s this . . . And this

    and so many more! It’s history now, folks.

  8. Justice22

    Justice22 said, about 4 years ago

    @walruscarver2000

    Actually, the CIA told Bush that Iraq was NOT pursuing weapons of mass destruction. Bush chose to believe what he was told in a dream and fabricated “evidence”.

  9. Justice22

    Justice22 said, about 4 years ago

    Why all the fuss? She hasn’t been nominated for anything new yet.

  10. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, about 4 years ago

    @Justice22

    So he only dreamed he got information from a former member of the Iraq staff. Granted he was told the guy was about as reliable as a dollar watch, but still…

  11. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, about 4 years ago

    corzak &ahab

    See what happens when you try to talk sense to them? Feeding frenzy.

  12. Simon_Jester

    Simon_Jester said, about 4 years ago

    ROFL X5: this froma guy who had never , EVER supplied anything to back up his claims but his own say so!

  13. Kip Peticolas

    Kip Peticolas said, about 4 years ago

    This is a valentine to Mr. Danziger, who has wit and sentience. His brilliant line with his pen creates haiku. His political satire is exquisite.
    I am puzzled by the surprising craziness of the comments. I keep running into an Ima character, infesting every vaguely liberal editorial cartoon commentary and relentlessly whining about something awful that liberals do. It seems a lot like bird droppings.
    Mr. Danziger, my family, with me, thank you for bringing a graceful, insightful and always Chekhovian image to these topics that daily grieve us.

  14. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, about 4 years ago

    @Kip Peticolas

    I am puzzled by the surprising craziness of the comments. I keep running into an Ima character, infesting every vaguely liberal editorial cartoon commentary and relentlessly whining about something awful that liberals do. It seems a lot like bird droppings.

    Ima, ongaurd, and their ilk are just trolls posting BS talking points and generally making things up for the sole purpose of annoying anyone who doesn’t follow lock-step with the Republican / Fox “News” agenda. Others aren’t so much trolls as they are willfully ignorant of anything not spoon feed to them by extremely biased sources. You may safely ignore them. They have no desire to engage in a fact based discourse.

  15. PianoGuy24

    PianoGuy24 GoComics PRO Member said, about 4 years ago

    @corzak

    Corzak, how convienient that you ONLY quote republicans that sought out war against Iraq. So, let’s play fair, you ALSO seemed to have missed THESE quotes from DEMOCRATS as well: http://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm
    I already know that your liberal mind won’t be able to comprehend these facts even tho you see it plain as day. You’ll find your twisted way to justify each and every one of them. (It’s called a double-standard in the real world…)

  16. Load the rest of the comments (17).