Jack Ohman by Jack Ohman

Jack Ohman

Comments (14) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon said, almost 2 years ago

    I dunno, I think the Tea Party and Fox News are pretty much the main spewers of hate in this country – an indirect cause of bloodshed (fiscal and human) on their hands.

  2. Stipple

    Stipple said, almost 2 years ago

    curious who these “marauding bands of savages” were that threatened the American Way into vigilantism.

  3. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    Most psychologists will agree that “pornography” actually tends to reduce violent acts against real people in the vast majority of cases.


    Violent speech, whether form La Pierre, Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Idi Amin, or others of the ilk, when combined with access to weapons and firepower, DOES lead to violent actions, “nationalism” going to extremes, and war, abroad, and at home.


    While “pornography” is relatively benign, violent rhetoric, especially aimed at the “unstable”, is not.


    Video games do still get mixed reviews, but it is scary that folks get from them that they are not only immune to violence, but also get the impression they’re omnipotent, and immortal. It doesn’t work that way.

  4. IntoVirginiaCreeper

    IntoVirginiaCreeper said, almost 2 years ago

    Stipple…It was called the British Army – the toadies of the Monarchy sent to deprive the American colonists of any autonomy.

  5. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, almost 2 years ago

    @theopolus
    you offer distraction. you propose more zimmermans.
    perhaps we can judge the mental health of people based on the size of the magazine they want to buy for their assault weapons.

    and i thought we got rid of the ‘maurading bands of savages’, with smallpox laced blankets, at least to start.

  6. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, almost 2 years ago

    @sstttrugglepup
    so you try to draw a moral equivalence between privacy, pornography and the extermination of an entire class of elementary school children.
    try again.

  7. MortyForTyrant

    MortyForTyrant said, almost 2 years ago

    You do realize that Gocomics might have to forward comments like that to the FBI in order to prevent the next mass-shooting by a mentally unstable person, right? Not that I would miss you around here…

  8. Gary McSpook

    Gary McSpook said, almost 2 years ago

    It’s always informative to read what kind of things people will propose after a mass murder. Proposing more mass murder seems rather perverse; but I noticed long ago that you right-wingers can always find reasons to do more killing. It seems to appeal to you.

  9. PlainBill

    PlainBill said, almost 2 years ago

    @KenseidenXL

    Once again you trot out the same fallacies when you equate highway deaths, drunk drivers, and guns. And of course you top it off by falsifying the number of deaths due to drunk drivers.

    For the record. The purpose of an automobile is to move people and products from one place to another. Alcohol is a legal drug that impairs one’s judgement. To that end, strict laws prohibit driving after drinking. An intelligent person would not that as the population goes up deaths due to drunk drivers have dropped, presumably because of the increased severity of the penalties.

    The purpose of any gun is to kill something. Don’t pretend that you bought a gun to put holes in targets – a screwdriver will do a better job. And the NRA has consistently opposed ANY legislation that would impede ANYONE from buying any firearm.

    And your big lie – traffic deaths from drunk driving have dropped below 10,000 a year – still far too high, but efforts are being made to reduce that number.

  10. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, almost 2 years ago

    ^^standard distraction strategy. classroom full of elementary schoolchildren exterminated by a man with a legal semi-automatic weapon with huge magazine. firefighters picked off as they respond to a fire by a man with a semi-automatic rifle like an amusement park game

    NOthing to see here, we can live with it, move on

    the REAL problem is liberals drunk driving. Funny how effective laws are able to make a real dent in drunk driving deaths but aren’t worth considering in assault weapons attacks.

  11. echoraven

    echoraven said, almost 2 years ago

    “Friends of the Swastika”; hate Hitler but like his ideas.

    I’m not sure what law or ban would stop mass shootings (since it’s illegal to mass murder), but all this talk do is prop up gun sales. If ignorance is bliss that the kool aid drinkers must be really happy (though this cartoon is not particularly cheerful…)

  12. Gary McSpook

    Gary McSpook said, almost 2 years ago

    Good old Walmart sure is doing well with their assault rifle sales; after the last tragedy, rather than take assault rifles off of the shelves, thjey left them up, and then bragged that they were almost sold out due to the rush to purchase them.
    Good old USA, nothing too horrible to prevent commerce. Hell, after 9/11 Pres. Bush encouraged people to get out and shop. So rest easily, young victims, your deaths are helping prop up the Walton family’s bottom line.

  13. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, almost 2 years ago

    ^a capitalist will seel you the rope to hang himself, if he can make a buck off it, and now the rope is made in china.

    and for those of you whom equate those of us that don’t consider the extermination of classroom full of elementary schoolchildren every month or so a reasonable price to pay for ‘freedom’ – with hitler. may i remind you that nazi germany was capitalist.

  14. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, almost 2 years ago

    ^your repeated drunk driving drivel is a distraction from the issues. drunk driving has been dramatically cut because of strictly enforced legislation and it continues to trend down. but that’s not the least of it, cars are not designed to kill living beings.
    hitler took jews, gays and other ‘undesireables’ and gave their wealth TO the citizens of germany. I don’t see your point. i am not talking about taking away civil rights, i’m talking about properly balancing civil rights.

  15. Refresh Comments.