Dana Summers by Dana Summers

Dana Summers

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, over 2 years ago

    Jeez, I missed the people kneeling down. I better change my vote against the do-nothing jobs jobs jobs RepubliCons quick!

  2. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 2 years ago

    Napoleon and Caesar were right too! Just ask them!

  3. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 2 years ago

    The GOP wailing that Obama is being “unconstitutional” would carry more weight if they hadn’t pushed through unconstitutional abortion restrictions on the very same day. Obama is a constitutional scholar. What he’s able to do is limited by the non-cooperation of congress, but it’s all perfectly legal.

  4. Tax Man

    Tax Man said, over 2 years ago


    You are so uninformed. The Republican controlled House has sent many bills to the senate for consideration, but the wonderful Harry (the word is out: he doesn’t pay taxes) Reid would not allow any of them to be debated.

  5. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 2 years ago

    And that is quite likely to happen. Well stated.

  6. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 2 years ago

    On the other hand……who among us (diehard conservatives included) would disagree that if one wants something badly enough, and one meets resistance at every attempt to work together, one has to either give up or do it himself? Whether it’s waiting for the roommates to wash their own dishes or waiting for the city to clean up the park across the street from your house…..“if you want the job done right, do it yourself”.

    There ARE limitations, of course. Just because your neighbor sorely needs to be removed from the human race, this does not give you the right to provide your neighborhood with that service.

    It will be fun to see how this plays out. Congress has become quite skilled at immobilizing government legislatively. It’s almost like there’s no fun left in it, they’re so polished. Let’s see how they do with trying to immobilize executive orders. Will our “representatives” have time to do this and still make all those calls begging for money?

  7. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, over 2 years ago


    Just because he taught college courses regarding the Constitution does not make him a “Constitutional Scholar.” With his disregard towards the specifics of the Constitution, he is anything but a scholar.

    Things like minimum wage laws, labor laws, and immigration laws all share one thing in common: They are laws. Laws are the Legislative Branch’s Domain, not the Executive’s. Therefor, he cannot dictate from on high any specific change as it pertains to laws.

    His only responsibility to laws once they are passed is that he faithfully execute them, unless they are deemed unconstitutional. And you know who does that? The Judicial Branch. The President does not have the authority, implied or expressed, to pick and choose what laws are to be obeyed, enforced, modified, or ignored. Just because Congress is “doing nothing,” still doesn’t give him the authority vested in another branch.

    The only reason he’s not being impeached or investigated or given any further rebuke is because he has a Democratic majority in the Senate. If that changes in 2014, you can expect things to be changed a lot.

  8. Fuzzy Thinker (I)

    Fuzzy Thinker (I) GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    How many Federal Workers are making less than $10 per hour? Not Many. This is what ‘Hope and CHANGE’ looks like for 300 million people.

  9. oldtruck66

    oldtruck66 said, over 2 years ago

    The David-Bacon act requires government contractors to pay a higher wage than other workers.

  10. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    ^^It’s “Davis-Bacon”, and it sets government job wages as those prevailing in the industry and region, not “higher than other workers”.

  11. wiatr

    wiatr GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    yes, people will be able to afford living. They’ll make their mortgage payments on time thus frustrating the big bankers who wanted to foreclose and re-sell the house. They’ll spend some on goods and services.
    Heavens, there;s no telling what this might do to those who bet against a good economy!

  12. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, over 2 years ago


    Why is it the taxpayer’s responsibility to make sure someone buys within their means and can pay a mortgage? Last I checked, home ownership is an individual responsibility and privilege, not a right.

  13. Refresh Comments.