Jeff Stahler for June 13, 2012

  1. Infantry
    aguirra3  almost 12 years ago

    Let me guess…soon you libs will want to tax their water…and you environmentalists are mad they left the water running…

     •  Reply
  2. Shark vs swimmer stencil copy
    SwimsWithSharks  almost 12 years ago

    Money down the drain.

     •  Reply
  3. Peter cooke   hood
    Ottodesu  almost 12 years ago

    Grew up on a farm that got wiped out during drought.

    Clean water taps left open and flowing straight into the drain make me cringe.

     •  Reply
  4. Img 0041
    Dapperdan61  Premium Member almost 12 years ago

    My home has lost over $100,000 in equity & my 401K tanked along with my job. If this isn’t a depression I don’t know what 1 would like otherwise.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    joe vignone  almost 12 years ago

    Heck of a lot better than a spoiled, entitled, nitwit, frat boy with a “C” average who gave us ECONOMEGEDDON.

     •  Reply
  6. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 12 years ago

    Beer and wine were drunk in many areas, and cultures, because the WATER would kill you. Given the rush to deregulation, and eliminating environmental laws, the repubtards in the House are pushing to return us there.

     •  Reply
  7. Cheryl 149 3
    Justice22  almost 12 years ago

    There was no way to tell that the minority in the Senate would block everything this president has attempted. —Will be the same next term.

     •  Reply
  8. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 12 years ago

    I’ve lived most of my life in areas where water is precious, limited, and hard to get. In the next 40 years, AMERICANS, in major cities, may see water soar in price, and not just bottled water, that is typically JUST FILTERED TAP WATER SOLD TO MORONS! Interestingly, N.Y. City has the best rated water in multiple purity and taste tests, and it just TAP water!!

     •  Reply
  9. Qwerty01s
    cjr53  almost 12 years ago

    They must be wealthy to let the water run like that after they’ve filled the glasses.

     •  Reply
  10. Don quixote 1955
    OmqR-IV.0  almost 12 years ago

    @Ottodesu et alI was thinking that perhaps the running tap symbolises that they had to give up bottled water, too?If we saw them toasting with glasses of water without a running tap in the background, we might presume bottled water, making them out to be snobs and that would undermine the whole premise of the cartoon!I think. Hmm, anyway. A bottle of champagne can be bought for $5.Then it’s likely not to be Champagne; bubbly/sparkling wine, sure, but not Champagne.Unlimited clean water is at our fingertipsThe energy required to do this is quite high & expensive. I remembering reading about Arabic countries doing this (and towing in icebergs) in the ’70s already.

     •  Reply
  11. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 12 years ago

    Desalinization requires huge inputs of energy, and the Saudis have been doing it for a long time, very, very, expensive for us here.

     •  Reply
  12. Makotrans
    Ketira  almost 12 years ago

    Of course not. I grew up in the Florida Keys; water there is expensive, and you learned to conserve just to keep your water bill down to manageable (for your own budget) levels! Every single drop used there is piped in from Homestead, from Key Largo to Key West! If anything were to happen to that pipeline, everyone down in that region would be using bottled water to brush their teeth! (They’d be using the Ocean/Gulf water to power the toilets.)NOW do you see why I’m an Environmentalist?

     •  Reply
  13. Makotrans
    Ketira  almost 12 years ago

    As I’ve told you before: You have yet to prove to me that you are even human.I’m pretty sure you’re an AI somewhere…..

     •  Reply
  14. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 12 years ago

    Ketira: Just to let you know I enjoy “give and take” with folks who may not “agree” on all issues, it’s far more fun, as long as both sides listen, and “agree to disagree” at times.

    South Florida, and the Keys, face increasing environmental problems, largely as you’re aware due to that thing called “carrying capacity”. We humans can abide living shoulder to shoulder in crowded conditions (okay, I can’t), but we have to pay attention to the old “rat in the closed habitat” issue, and haven’t so far, especially in the “conservative community” which is certainly NOT the “conservation community”.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Jeff Stahler