Clay Jones for May 17, 2012

Twits. They claim moral authority but vote someone qualified and competent down because of their narrow-minded little prejudices. And the people who claim it is “religious freedom” to oppress gay people are simply amazing to me. What about THEIR religious freedom?

@Bruce4671 – the Mythbusters proved that theory wrong: kwc.org/mythbusters/2007/08/episode_85_red_rag_to_a_bull_h.html

….and that URL got cut off. Just google “Mythbusters red flag at bull” and you’ll see the two video links.

Quite a few congregations are accepting “LGBT” individuals, even if they don’t “live” that lifestyle, it’s part of that true, “do unto others” bit. As to the “100 bulls” bit, I’ve been in a corral with 60 and done it, nothing happens. I also seem to remember seeing, years later, the mythbusters segment Ketira cited.

Apparently constitutional protections don’t matter when they’re inconvenient to a selectively pious bunch. Are divorcees allowed to be judges? Crickets

they look pretty happy to me

Good start Jase99, but you should add the Unitarian Universalists.

Yeah, nothing worse then a judge who follows the constitution. If only it weren’t for that pesky 14th ammendment.