Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for January 24, 2012

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  over 12 years ago

    How about Mr. Flip-Flopper?

     •  Reply
  2. Stewiebrian
    pouncingtiger  over 12 years ago

    @leftwingpatriot, don’t forget about the other Mr. Flip-Flopper, Newt Gingrich.

     •  Reply
  3. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  over 12 years ago

    One could call Mitt Mr. 13.9 Percent for the taxes he paid.

     •  Reply
  4. Psn logo free.square triangle ex o
    DylanThomas3.14159  over 12 years ago

    Roland’s question does raise an interesting point: How can a CAREER-long period of time be LIMITED? æThe Presidency is already term-limited, to a max of 8 years. [Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected to serve 16 years (4 terms), though he actually served only 12 years and a few months, due to his untimely death, and the limit was added afterward]. Romney was governor of Massachusetts for only one term; he decided not to seek a second. One term of governorship in Massachusetts lasts 4 years. But the State does not limit the number of times one person can run for governor. Hedley’s question is not a “cheap shot”. Why did Romney choose not to answer it? Why did he choose rather to attack Roland for calling him “governor”? Why does Romney consider that a" cheap shot"?

     •  Reply
  5. Psn logo free.square triangle ex o
    DylanThomas3.14159  over 12 years ago

    The only answer to my own comment I can think of is that Romney considers government so bad that he shouldn’t even have run for governor of Massachusetts, much less be running for President of the U.S.A.

     •  Reply
  6. B48c50204eb9e99c6b21d5ef53e333aa
    coolwaterman  over 12 years ago

    Baby I’m a rich man… Baby I’m a rich man. How’s that for a cheap shot?

     •  Reply
  7. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member over 12 years ago

    I don’t remember anyone bringing up term limits in this election cycle. Is this a jab at Hedley’s fixation on the irrelevant?

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Doughfoot  over 12 years ago

    If a Democrat proposed employing poor kids as school janitors so that they could have the opportunity to earn money rather than receive food stamps, etc., the Right would denounce the proposal as just another socialist attempt to foster dependence on Big Brother by creating millions of new government jobs. As Newt proposed it, it was denounced by the Left as an attempt to eliminate the jobs of millions of janitors and replace them with underpaid and exploited poor children. It could, in fact, be neither, depending on how it was carried out. But, of course, a dispassionate, sane and rational discussion of the pros and cons and more importantly, the details of how such a proposal would work (or whether or not who mops the school floor is any business of the President of the United States) will never take place.

     •  Reply
  9. Calvin1
    Starrman69  over 12 years ago

    Quite a few school systems have followed business into hiring cleaning services that do employ workers that make less than what they were paying their janitors…and some of those services have the requirement that one speaks Spanish in order to communicate with their co-workers….

     •  Reply
  10. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  over 12 years ago

    That’s BD.

     •  Reply
  11. Strawberrycreekv7
    Tea_Pea  over 12 years ago

    Is it bad that I’m just now noticing that the Republican primaries bear a somewhat-more-than-passing-resemblance to “Alice Through The Looking Glass”?

     •  Reply
  12. Logo
    cdhaley  over 12 years ago

    In the Book of Mormon, it is written:

    “It is easier for Belial to pass through the eye of a newt than it is for Mammon to get into the White House.”—-Mitt 19:24

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    tigre1  over 12 years ago

    Mopping the floors by near-enslaved kids is about as near to presidential concerns as the gangrene itch should get.

     •  Reply
  14. Img 20230721 103439220 hdr
    kaffekup   over 12 years ago

    " Romney considers government so bad "They all consider government bad; they just want desperately to run it. Then they run it so badly that the average person comes to hate it and lets them use it to further enrich their already wealthy friends.Whenever I see the Forbes list, and the Walton family’s estimated $60B net wealth, I wonder, How much is enough? Do they really have to wring every penny out of their employees that they can? And then do all they can to get a “pro-business government”?

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    Alms4Thorby  over 12 years ago

    He’s not at the top.

     •  Reply
  16. 20141103 115559
    Potrzebie  over 12 years ago

    Just wait two weeks and see what GBT comes up with about the grinch. The possibilities are endless.

     •  Reply
  17. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  over 12 years ago

    Trudeau has been going after the Grinch this month. Check out strips on 1/8 and 1/15.

     •  Reply
  18. Psn logo free.square triangle ex o
    DylanThomas3.14159  over 12 years ago

    I’m beginning to think that sammysock is best left ignored.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    diggitt  over 12 years ago

    DTPi, what’s with the “trailer trash” shot? That came out of nowhere. One of this strip’s most beloved characters lives in a trailer. Generally, people who live in trailers have no other choice.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury