I opposed Hillary, so I’m automatically sexist even though I originally supported Warren to run and voted for a woman who wasn’t Hillary. Doesn’t matter. Anyone who didn’t support Hillary is sexist. Just ask her supporters.
I have always been amazed at how many conservatives do not know that “Neoliberal” refers to their own Libertarian-Republican economic beliefs and policies and not to the Liberal Democrats. That is, of course, until I learned that a great many Republicans could care less about education beyond the sixth grade.
@NRHAWK, The same can be said of neoconservatism ….
" … Neoconservatism first manifested in the early 1970s. It started among disaffected – mostly Jewish – liberals and some former leftists (yeah, we know it doesn’t make sense) from the Schactmanite branch of Trotskyism who were upset at mainstream liberalism’s “unwillingness”2 to confront the Soviet Union and its “soft” stance on national security, and aversion to the counterculture. One example is Social Democrats, USAWikipedia’s W.svg, a bizarre party which has a social democratic faction and a neoconservative faction, with the social democrats in the party criticizes the neocons, and the neocons denying they’re neocons. Also of importance to the early neoconservatives was what they saw as decreasing levels of support for Israel.3 The term was coined by the democratic socialist Michael HarringtonWikipedia’s W.svg in the 1970s.4
Together, they forged a vision of an interventionist US that acted muscularly abroad to support human rights, democracy, and free markets (the last was seen as essential in protecting the first two). Yet early neoconservatives were also relatively comfortable with the level of state welfare. Both their interventionism and their commitment to free trade made them remarkably different from the rest of the conservative tradition; nonetheless, they became part of the broader New Right coalition during the 1970s and 1980 … "
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Neoconservatism
" Neoconservatism (commonly shortened to neocon) is a political movement born in the United States during the 1960s among conservative-leaning Democrats who became disenchanted with the party’s foreign policy.[citation needed] Many of its adherents became politically famous during the Republican presidential administrations of the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. …. "
Can anyone think of any other Presidency where they were still talking about the losing candidate for months after the election was Over? I can’t think of one.
The dumpster isn’t stupid. The dumpster isn’t crazy (in the normal sense of the word). He’s a psychopath. Psychopaths have one objective, their agenda. Whatever that agenda is, it is the single and only thing they value more than life itself. Determine his agenda and thwart it. Do that and you will stop, if not destroy the dumpster.
Masterskrain Premium Member almost 7 years ago
And he’s a typical Conservative Cupcake.
Jason Allen almost 7 years ago
I opposed Hillary, so I’m automatically sexist even though I originally supported Warren to run and voted for a woman who wasn’t Hillary. Doesn’t matter. Anyone who didn’t support Hillary is sexist. Just ask her supporters.
NRHAWK Premium Member almost 7 years ago
I have always been amazed at how many conservatives do not know that “Neoliberal” refers to their own Libertarian-Republican economic beliefs and policies and not to the Liberal Democrats. That is, of course, until I learned that a great many Republicans could care less about education beyond the sixth grade.
superposition almost 7 years ago
@NRHAWK, The same can be said of neoconservatism ….
" … Neoconservatism first manifested in the early 1970s. It started among disaffected – mostly Jewish – liberals and some former leftists (yeah, we know it doesn’t make sense) from the Schactmanite branch of Trotskyism who were upset at mainstream liberalism’s “unwillingness”2 to confront the Soviet Union and its “soft” stance on national security, and aversion to the counterculture. One example is Social Democrats, USAWikipedia’s W.svg, a bizarre party which has a social democratic faction and a neoconservative faction, with the social democrats in the party criticizes the neocons, and the neocons denying they’re neocons. Also of importance to the early neoconservatives was what they saw as decreasing levels of support for Israel.3 The term was coined by the democratic socialist Michael HarringtonWikipedia’s W.svg in the 1970s.4
Together, they forged a vision of an interventionist US that acted muscularly abroad to support human rights, democracy, and free markets (the last was seen as essential in protecting the first two). Yet early neoconservatives were also relatively comfortable with the level of state welfare. Both their interventionism and their commitment to free trade made them remarkably different from the rest of the conservative tradition; nonetheless, they became part of the broader New Right coalition during the 1970s and 1980 … "
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Neoconservatism
" Neoconservatism (commonly shortened to neocon) is a political movement born in the United States during the 1960s among conservative-leaning Democrats who became disenchanted with the party’s foreign policy.[citation needed] Many of its adherents became politically famous during the Republican presidential administrations of the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. …. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism
Tue Elung-Jensen almost 7 years ago
Why on earth would she vote Hillary then?
sofartotheleftimright almost 7 years ago
Can anyone think of any other Presidency where they were still talking about the losing candidate for months after the election was Over? I can’t think of one.
Radish the wordsmith almost 7 years ago
And you’re a beer drinking pig.
WestNYC Premium Member almost 7 years ago
Ms. Sorenson has hurled many a label towards those she has disagreed with, just sayin.
kaffekup almost 7 years ago
The only problem with refusing to vote for the lesser of two evils is you get full-bore evil, and it’s very hard to get rid of, once it’s got power.
Mr. Blawt almost 7 years ago
Would that make him a NeoDictatorRightConRacist? Or just a snowflake?
mr_sherman Premium Member almost 7 years ago
The dumpster isn’t stupid. The dumpster isn’t crazy (in the normal sense of the word). He’s a psychopath. Psychopaths have one objective, their agenda. Whatever that agenda is, it is the single and only thing they value more than life itself. Determine his agenda and thwart it. Do that and you will stop, if not destroy the dumpster.
Teto85 Premium Member almost 7 years ago
And he’s just an a$$hole.