By insisting that the election was rigged, Trump has put the left, and the president, in the uncomfortable position of having to insist that they were not. So, with the left insisting that the election was not rigged, how can they, in good faith, insist on a recount?
A circuit court judge ruled that the count does not have to be by hand. Recount the same way as the count and nothing changes. Why not put the uncertainties to rest and do a test case properly? unless the results are feared.
Dirty Dragon over 7 years ago
I see where the election officials of WisKochistan are confident that a recount will not change the outcome.
louieglutz over 7 years ago
recounts won’t solve anything. an in-depth audit is needed. this won’t accomplish anything but more media time for ms stein.
WestNYC Premium Member over 7 years ago
Millions voted illegally for CHarUMP.
PainterArt Premium Member over 7 years ago
Yeah no point finding out the facts and putting this vote rigging and illegal votes to rest.
.
If it is a waste of money (which I agree with), than stop talking about illegal votes in the millions.
I Quit over 7 years ago
By insisting that the election was rigged, Trump has put the left, and the president, in the uncomfortable position of having to insist that they were not. So, with the left insisting that the election was not rigged, how can they, in good faith, insist on a recount?
Happy Two Shoes over 7 years ago
To bad the Electoral College elected a psychopath who is in way over his coiffed head.
Gypsy8 over 7 years ago
A circuit court judge ruled that the count does not have to be by hand. Recount the same way as the count and nothing changes. Why not put the uncertainties to rest and do a test case properly? unless the results are feared.