Mike Lester for August 02, 2016

I got no problem with racy photos of Melania. Just can’t figure why a pro-Trump paper is running them. Is it to distract from the stupid things Trump keeps saying?

Is it just because MIke is a prude, or always wrong.

But why does she just stand beside her husband and say nothing? Is she expected not to speak?

But that would mean being consistent.

Actually, the ‘Leftie rag’ that printed the pictures was the New York Post…. Which has endorsed Trump, and released when Trump has lost 7+ poll points in a DAY… Also turns out the photographer is a friend of the Post… wonder if they were trying to get the left to distract from the Khan debacle…

Personally I don’t care if Melania Trump walks down Fifth Avenue in the nude. But I do wonder if Lester is happy that the woman he wants to be First Lady posed for soft core porn? Or will he just try to deflect the conversation. This is not the left’s problem, Mike, the question is what do family-values Evangelical Republican think about this? Are they happy?

Republican ‘family values’ are a myth.Your first lady would be a third wife exstripper.Check out the story on the Trump’s kids trip to Iceland for moral depravity.

Typical Lester BS. The Left doesn’t “approve” or “disapprove” of porn. We just defend people’s right to view it if they wish. Unlike the Repuglies who are bunch or hypocrites. They like it as much but are just a bunch or scolds and busy-bodies, so worried someone else might be having fun.

Trump brags about his multiple “conquests”, and even his cheating on his previous wives, but he’s okay. Melania was a MODEL, no big deal about posing nude, and that alone isn’t pornographic, any more than is the marble statue of Diana, or the bare breasts of “Lady Justice” that ol’ prude Ashcroft covered up. What’s pornographic about Melania is her choice of a husband and ignoring his past, to go after his cash.(Hmm, about the word “prostitution” though.)

Gross generalization as if conservatives or even high moral “christians” like Lester do not look at porn.

If Lester is saying the left defends the right of porn or Melania Trump to pose nude, I have got no problem with what other people do and defend their constitutional right to do so. This includes porn. Personally, I think Melania should be left out of the politics unless her actions are political like a speech.

What find hypocritical about this cartoon is supposed higher than though “christians” like Lester are actually voting for someone like Trump:

“I don’t think Ivanka would do that [pose for nude photographs] inside the magazine,” Trump says, speaking for his daughter. “Although she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said that if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps, I would be dating her.”

And then, as the words he had just spoken formed meaning in his mind, Trump asked: “Is that terrible?”

http://fusion.net/story/176716/heres-the-creepy-video-of-donald-trump-saying-hed-date-his-own-daughter/

We could go into all sort of things that should rub these high moral “christians” the wrong way about Trump. How about the fact that he promoted and made money off of gambling as one of his main businesses?

What Lester does not get is that moral arguements trumping over constitutional rights communicates nothing to the left. Conservatives complain about the government getting into people business because it is what they do best.

The left does not endorse a racy photo lifestyle. That is the Republican candidate’s wife. The Republicans have no problem with her showing off the one thing she didn’t plagiarize. Too bad they turn around and cast stones at others for the very same thing.

I guess you’d have to assume that Lester approves of Melania Trump posing for the photos.

Because, you know:It’s OKAY If A Republican Does It.

Ah, yes Seagull, “Chester the Molester”, Denny Hastert’s early days!!

How pathetic can you be?!