Robert Ariail for April 24, 2016

  1. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  about 8 years ago

    My maternal grandfather was Cherokee, good riddance Andy.

     •  Reply
  2. Don quixote 1955
    OmqR-IV.0  about 8 years ago

    Because of Hollywood’s success and the US’s very successful TV products which are consumed the world over, folks outside the USA get an overload of American history (as told by the victors, naturally) and are often as knowledgeable about America’s past as their own country’s past. (erm, or as ignorant, cuts both ways)

    It didn’t surprise me at all that I had to look up Harriet Tubman. Never, ever heard of her before.

    At any rate, cool.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    edward thomas Premium Member about 8 years ago

    Jackson was a “populist”, and good for him. However, he was against a National Bank, and managed to eliminate our first effort at creating one, leading to all the different “currencies” and bank failures, etc. until we got our act together in the 20th century.The Fed isn’t perfect, but Jackson, with his views, never belonged on a DOLLAR bill, let alone a 20!All because he won a battle AFTER a war was over! Thank God for sailing ships and slow communications?

     •  Reply
  4. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member about 8 years ago

    About time.

     •  Reply
  5. Cicada avatar
    Dirty Dragon  about 8 years ago

    This act had worn thin 50 years ago.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    rick92040  about 8 years ago

    Watch Fox much Tom?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    marketfog  about 8 years ago

    I never could figure out why Jackson was honored on the 20: he nearly sank the country. A much more important female figure than Tubman in the history of the country and among the black community was Eleanor Roosevelt. Personally, I would have preferred Pres. Truman. He made the gut wrenching decision which ended WW2, saved Europe, both from starving and from the communists, and began the integration of the military.

     •  Reply
  8. Coloradofiedcalifornia
    californicated1  about 8 years ago

    What would be more interesting is when some people, guided and/or misguided by their idealism, decide that Andrew Jackson’s name should be removed from Fort Jackson outside of Columbia, South Kaki-Laki.

     •  Reply
  9. Img 20230721 103439220 hdr
    kaffekup   about 8 years ago

    Jackson’s been on the 20 for nearly a century, far longer than the nonentities who preceded him. He’s had a good run, and is not divine, so, time to go.

     •  Reply
  10. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  about 8 years ago

    ^itisme: if I’d been my American citizen, educated and religious ancestor, back then, wouldn’t have liked Andy or the Congress. BTW: the Cherokee were more “Christian” and educated within their population than was that Congess!!

     •  Reply
  11. Wtp
    superposition  about 8 years ago

    http://www.businessinsider.com/complete-history-20-bill-2012-9?op=1

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    WestNYC Premium Member about 8 years ago

    Democrat Jackson will be replaced by Rebublican Tubman; this is a good thing.

     •  Reply
  13. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 8 years ago

    “Simple blacks” to vote democratic.—As compared to calling Mexicans rapists and drug dealers to get “simple whites” to vote for Republicans?

     •  Reply
  14. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 8 years ago

    What place in history? His anti-bank policies lead to the first major fiscal crisis in US history in 1837. His defiance of the Supreme Court lead to the genocidal watch of the Cherokee people from Georgia to Oklahoma.His victory at New Orleans was meaningless. The peace treaty ending the War of 1812 had been signed 14 days prior to battle.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    edward thomas Premium Member about 8 years ago

    If most Americans differed with Jackson, why was he elected? As I said, he shouldn’t have been on ANY bill due to his economic policies alone.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    edward thomas Premium Member about 8 years ago

    So Trump and his minions, who get MAJOR welfare from OUR government, DON’T want to keep us in servitude?I LOVE (not) how he’s ONLY this way, and he’ll CHANGE once he gets the nomination!He is a clueless ignoramus who thinks the world revolves around HIM!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Robert Ariail