Harsh gun laws really helped Paris, no? And no gun zones in Denver, University of Virginia, et al, solved that problem too, didn’t they?
I am a trained, retired soldier. I conceal carry. I will use my .45 ACP to protect the innocent from monsters, lunatics and criminals. You are far safer in my presence than in the presence of a 4 person news team from MSNBC. I will use my weapon and my body, if necessary, to protect and/or shield you. Even if the cost is my own life. MSNBC, on the other hand, will be only too happy to film your massacre for fame and ratings as they crouch behind a car.
I just find it difficult to believe we will do away with violent crime by disarming the victims.
Oh, and about 2 million times per year, private, lawful guns stop or prevent crimes. The media, who lick the behinds of the DNC, will not publish the facts.
No, I am not an NRA member and cannot stand the sound of Wayne LaPierre’s voice. I have been around the world three or four times and I have seen what happens when The People of a nation are disarmed. It is far worse than 10,000 murders. Oh, why not get rid of cars and alcohol then? That combination kills some 12,000 people per year.
Did you know that, according to the FBI, you are almost FIFTY times more likely to be beaten to death by hands, fists and feet than to be killed by a military-style assault weapon, or by ANY firearm in a mass shooting? Probably not, but then, mathematics is not the strong suit of leftists.
Poor fools. Wait until the killers decide to use bombs (again, as in Paris). Then you’ll see REAL casualty counts. Don’t think you can ban explosives, either. Anyone who has taken high school chemistry can make a bomb from common household chemicals and set it off by fuse, timer or cell phone. IEDs of varying power are almost ridiculously easy to make.
prfesser is correct. The gun nius make wild claims as to how they save inocent persons lives, but I have yet to read of one in the news. Usually the nut shoots the molested person instead of the molester.
The old two million crimes prevented by guns again, no proof whatsoever for this old saw from the NRA. (Used again by someone who’s “not NRA”, but willing to use that silly projection.)
Why are their ratings so much higher?.Well, Faux Nooze’s explanation is that they are an “Entertainment Network”..That and the Amazing number of Corporate Owned Businesses which keep their Televisions tuned to Faux Nooze 24/7.
Moron left off the second comparison panel where the shooter just mows everyone down conveniently disarmed for him in “gun free” zones. That’s the better alternative.
morningglory73 Premium Member over 8 years ago
How are these children getting guns? Irresponsible parents?
NeedaChuckle Premium Member over 8 years ago
I find it fascinating that Republicans are politicizing the 100+ deaths in France but stay mum when it comes to the 10,000 gun murders a year, here.
hawgowar over 8 years ago
Harsh gun laws really helped Paris, no? And no gun zones in Denver, University of Virginia, et al, solved that problem too, didn’t they?
I am a trained, retired soldier. I conceal carry. I will use my .45 ACP to protect the innocent from monsters, lunatics and criminals. You are far safer in my presence than in the presence of a 4 person news team from MSNBC. I will use my weapon and my body, if necessary, to protect and/or shield you. Even if the cost is my own life. MSNBC, on the other hand, will be only too happy to film your massacre for fame and ratings as they crouch behind a car.
I just find it difficult to believe we will do away with violent crime by disarming the victims.
Oh, and about 2 million times per year, private, lawful guns stop or prevent crimes. The media, who lick the behinds of the DNC, will not publish the facts.
No, I am not an NRA member and cannot stand the sound of Wayne LaPierre’s voice. I have been around the world three or four times and I have seen what happens when The People of a nation are disarmed. It is far worse than 10,000 murders. Oh, why not get rid of cars and alcohol then? That combination kills some 12,000 people per year.
Did you know that, according to the FBI, you are almost FIFTY times more likely to be beaten to death by hands, fists and feet than to be killed by a military-style assault weapon, or by ANY firearm in a mass shooting? Probably not, but then, mathematics is not the strong suit of leftists.
Poor fools. Wait until the killers decide to use bombs (again, as in Paris). Then you’ll see REAL casualty counts. Don’t think you can ban explosives, either. Anyone who has taken high school chemistry can make a bomb from common household chemicals and set it off by fuse, timer or cell phone. IEDs of varying power are almost ridiculously easy to make.
lesmcf over 8 years ago
prfesser is correct. The gun nius make wild claims as to how they save inocent persons lives, but I have yet to read of one in the news. Usually the nut shoots the molested person instead of the molester.
Dtroutma over 8 years ago
The old two million crimes prevented by guns again, no proof whatsoever for this old saw from the NRA. (Used again by someone who’s “not NRA”, but willing to use that silly projection.)
kaffekup over 8 years ago
Faux’ ratings are higher because all the RWNJs are ordered to watch it. Rational people split their viewing among numerous sources.
kaffekup over 8 years ago
https://m.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/23/1338538/—The-Science-Of-Fox-News-Why-Its-Viewers-Are-The-Most-Misinformed?detail=emailclassic
Tarredandfeathered over 8 years ago
Why are their ratings so much higher?.Well, Faux Nooze’s explanation is that they are an “Entertainment Network”..That and the Amazing number of Corporate Owned Businesses which keep their Televisions tuned to Faux Nooze 24/7.
daddyvortex over 8 years ago
Moron left off the second comparison panel where the shooter just mows everyone down conveniently disarmed for him in “gun free” zones. That’s the better alternative.