Chip Bok for July 23, 2015

  1. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  almost 9 years ago

    Both those people did not say those things nor is that what is driving their actions. So what is the point other than to denigrate the president and block an international agreement that will prevent Iran from building the bomb. This large block of America that supports death, destruction, and turbulence but attempts to block real progress to peace is getting very annoying.

     •  Reply
  2. Hague1
    IAMTHELAW Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    Amen Gypsy. I only follow this strip to know how low the stupid side is stooping.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    DrDon1  almost 9 years ago

    This cartoon is beneath Bok’s usual low standard.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    rallsolo  almost 9 years ago

    Yet here he is saying, and I quote, “Yes, death to America.” You poor saps can’t even pretend it doesn’t count because the news story comes from CNN, not Fox News. http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2015/03/23/tsr-acosta-iran-ayatollah-nuke-talks.cnn

     •  Reply
  5. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 9 years ago

    To H-E-double toothpicks to the UN and all the nations of the world that support an agreement, we only support the “he has WMDs and we know exactly where they are”, and “I see more dead people” crowd?

    It’s time to tell Netanyahu to stop his own agressions against his neighbors (and non-Jewish citizens), and shut up.

    It’s time to give peace a chance, even in the Middle East.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    oneoldhat  almost 9 years ago

    so according to dtroutma it is ok for Israel neighbors to fire rockets at Israel but wrong for Israel to strike back

     •  Reply
  7. Ys
    HabaneroBuck  almost 9 years ago

    The Ayatollah gave an address to his nation after the agreement with an AK-47 at his side. The visual prop couldn’t be more obvious as to its intended subtext: “Death to America”. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/21/media-ignore-ayatollahs-rifle-at-speech-about-nuclear-program/

     •  Reply
  8. 200
    Michael Peterson Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    The Ayatollah, huh? And what do you think President Reagan’s response should be?

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    DrDon1  almost 9 years ago

    After President Reagan signed a nuclear arms treaty with the Soviet Union, he said, defending his action to his conservative base, “Well, I think as long as you’ve got a chance to strive for peace, you strive for peace.”

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Chip Bok