Hillary’s real flaws aside, she’s been chewing up and spitting out nonsense like this for over 20 years already. She’s no John Kerry. Expect outraged cries of “YOU SANK OUR SWIFTBOAT!”
yes, Jase99, the “Responsible” reaction to documented evidence of “Influence For Money” is to point to opponents who do not begin to have the baggage of a lifetime history of seeking after “The Money”!-http://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2015/04/23/the-emerging-clinton-foundation-scandal/?print=1-An independent prosecutor should be chosen by Congress to avoid the president’s bias, and a RICO case is justified IMO.-Democrat Senator Menendez (NJ) was just indicted by Obama’s “Justice Dept.” on far less evidence than there exists for the Clintons. And before “Clinton Cash” (a 10 year research product) was published the author gave it to several non-conservative entities to review and comment: the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC TV, Fox News and others. None of them denounced the book, and many are doing their own research because common sense is seeing the serious and authentic evidence that something in the Clinton Foundation is very rotten and smelly!
And yet, there are people looking at the book, (not just LIIIBERALS) who are finding many, many errors and misinformation.(and I would rather someone other than Hillary as potus)
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/26/11-explosive-clinton-cash-facts-mainstream-media-confirm-are-accurate/-Eleven of the reported violations of law/rules in the book Clinton Cash have been checked and found to be true, by the liberal Main Stream Media!-Facts are Facts.-Pointing to others does not acquit Bill and Hillary!
Observer fo Irony about 9 years ago
Learning how the other 1% are doing it are we?
Gypsy8 about 9 years ago
The Koch gang just use the system that they helped design and paid for to buy benefits, influence, and power.
Kip W about 9 years ago
Hillary’s real flaws aside, she’s been chewing up and spitting out nonsense like this for over 20 years already. She’s no John Kerry. Expect outraged cries of “YOU SANK OUR SWIFTBOAT!”
kline0800 about 9 years ago
yes, Jase99, the “Responsible” reaction to documented evidence of “Influence For Money” is to point to opponents who do not begin to have the baggage of a lifetime history of seeking after “The Money”!-http://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2015/04/23/the-emerging-clinton-foundation-scandal/?print=1-An independent prosecutor should be chosen by Congress to avoid the president’s bias, and a RICO case is justified IMO.-Democrat Senator Menendez (NJ) was just indicted by Obama’s “Justice Dept.” on far less evidence than there exists for the Clintons. And before “Clinton Cash” (a 10 year research product) was published the author gave it to several non-conservative entities to review and comment: the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC TV, Fox News and others. None of them denounced the book, and many are doing their own research because common sense is seeing the serious and authentic evidence that something in the Clinton Foundation is very rotten and smelly!
eugene57 about 9 years ago
And yet, there are people looking at the book, (not just LIIIBERALS) who are finding many, many errors and misinformation.(and I would rather someone other than Hillary as potus)
kline0800 about 9 years ago
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/26/11-explosive-clinton-cash-facts-mainstream-media-confirm-are-accurate/-Eleven of the reported violations of law/rules in the book Clinton Cash have been checked and found to be true, by the liberal Main Stream Media!-Facts are Facts.-Pointing to others does not acquit Bill and Hillary!