Scandal of the day. No proof of wrong doing, only a lot of mud slinging to stop the candidate they are afraid of. Usual conservative tactic. I really wish they would contribute the money they spend mud slinging on trying to fix some of the problems people deal with every day.
LOL- I sure would like to go into business with you – I’ve always wondered what it would be like to work with someone as gullible as you.
Because an email for the Secretary of State wouldn’t sway any aspect of that deal – right.
Why do you think the servers are gone? She needed to be sure that her nefarious dealings wouldn’t be inadvertently released and her obfuscation is working on the ideologues.
“Giustra took specific aim at a report this week in the New York Times that suggested his contributions to the Clinton Foundation were aimed at gaining the blessing of the State Department — then about to be headed by Hillary Clinton — for a lucrative uranium deal involving Russian and Kazakh interests.“There is not one shred of evidence to back up the Times’ conclusions,” Giustra wrote. “This is not about me, but rather an attempt to tear down Secretary Clinton and her presidential campaign. If this is what passes for investigative journalism in the United States, it is very sad.”“I sold all of my stakes in the uranium company — Uranium One — in the fall of 2007, after it merged with another company,” Giustra said. “I would note that those were sold at least 18 months before Hillary Clinton became the Secretary of State. No one was speculating at that time that she would become the Secretary of State.” He called the Times report “a wildly speculative, innuendo-laced article.”http://www.ibtimes.com/top-clinton-foundation-donor-says-his-money-had-nothing-do-support-colombian-trade-1895948The New York Times get information from a Republican operative who is selling a book and supposedly verifies the fact but fails to interview the donor or get the other side of the story. Past the smell test? There are dots they are just not logically connected. I doubt any politicians are quote clean as big money and lobbyist have easy access. It is not as if lobbyist does not write legislation or portions of legislation. The whole non-profit thing is way out of control especially with politician foundations and political advocacy groups.
Sure glad to know the Iraq war bankrupted Halliburton and Lockheed Martin and the Cheney’s never made a penny and never will. Just one small fraud for a man (or family), one giant leap for his personal bank account.
Theodore E. Lind Premium Member about 9 years ago
Scandal of the day. No proof of wrong doing, only a lot of mud slinging to stop the candidate they are afraid of. Usual conservative tactic. I really wish they would contribute the money they spend mud slinging on trying to fix some of the problems people deal with every day.
Zen-of-Zinfandel about 9 years ago
How’s that Chipotle delivery app working?
JoeRaisin about 9 years ago
LOL- I sure would like to go into business with you – I’ve always wondered what it would be like to work with someone as gullible as you.
Because an email for the Secretary of State wouldn’t sway any aspect of that deal – right.
Why do you think the servers are gone? She needed to be sure that her nefarious dealings wouldn’t be inadvertently released and her obfuscation is working on the ideologues.
PainterArt Premium Member about 9 years ago
“Giustra took specific aim at a report this week in the New York Times that suggested his contributions to the Clinton Foundation were aimed at gaining the blessing of the State Department — then about to be headed by Hillary Clinton — for a lucrative uranium deal involving Russian and Kazakh interests.“There is not one shred of evidence to back up the Times’ conclusions,” Giustra wrote. “This is not about me, but rather an attempt to tear down Secretary Clinton and her presidential campaign. If this is what passes for investigative journalism in the United States, it is very sad.”“I sold all of my stakes in the uranium company — Uranium One — in the fall of 2007, after it merged with another company,” Giustra said. “I would note that those were sold at least 18 months before Hillary Clinton became the Secretary of State. No one was speculating at that time that she would become the Secretary of State.” He called the Times report “a wildly speculative, innuendo-laced article.”http://www.ibtimes.com/top-clinton-foundation-donor-says-his-money-had-nothing-do-support-colombian-trade-1895948The New York Times get information from a Republican operative who is selling a book and supposedly verifies the fact but fails to interview the donor or get the other side of the story. Past the smell test? There are dots they are just not logically connected. I doubt any politicians are quote clean as big money and lobbyist have easy access. It is not as if lobbyist does not write legislation or portions of legislation. The whole non-profit thing is way out of control especially with politician foundations and political advocacy groups.
Dtroutma about 9 years ago
Sure glad to know the Iraq war bankrupted Halliburton and Lockheed Martin and the Cheney’s never made a penny and never will. Just one small fraud for a man (or family), one giant leap for his personal bank account.